IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0095148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encoded Expansion: An Efficient Algorithm to Discover Identical String Motifs

Author

Listed:
  • Aqil M Azmi
  • Abdulrakeeb Al-Ssulami

Abstract

A major task in computational biology is the discovery of short recurring string patterns known as motifs. Most of the schemes to discover motifs are either stochastic or combinatorial in nature. Stochastic approaches do not guarantee finding the correct motifs, while the combinatorial schemes tend to have an exponential time complexity with respect to motif length. To alleviate the cost, the combinatorial approach exploits dynamic data structures such as trees or graphs. Recently (Karci (2009) Efficient automatic exact motif discovery algorithms for biological sequences, Expert Systems with Applications 36:7952–7963) devised a deterministic algorithm that finds all the identical copies of string motifs of all sizes in theoretical time complexity of and a space complexity of where is the length of the input sequence and is the length of the longest possible string motif. In this paper, we present a significant improvement on Karci's original algorithm. The algorithm that we propose reports all identical string motifs of sizes that occur at least times. Our algorithm starts with string motifs of size 2, and at each iteration it expands the candidate string motifs by one symbol throwing out those that occur less than times in the entire input sequence. We use a simple array and data encoding to achieve theoretical worst-case time complexity of and a space complexity of Encoding of the substrings can speed up the process of comparison between string motifs. Experimental results on random and real biological sequences confirm that our algorithm has indeed a linear time complexity and it is more scalable in terms of sequence length than the existing algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Aqil M Azmi & Abdulrakeeb Al-Ssulami, 2014. "Encoded Expansion: An Efficient Algorithm to Discover Identical String Motifs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0095148
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095148&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0095148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Siddharthan & Eric D Siggia & Erik van Nimwegen, 2005. "PhyloGibbs: A Gibbs Sampling Motif Finder That Incorporates Phylogeny," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Dotu & Scott I Adamson & Benjamin Coleman & Cyril Fournier & Emma Ricart-Altimiras & Eduardo Eyras & Jeffrey H Chuang, 2018. "SARNAclust: Semi-automatic detection of RNA protein binding motifs from immunoprecipitation data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Harri Lähdesmäki & Alistair G Rust & Ilya Shmulevich, 2008. "Probabilistic Inference of Transcription Factor Binding from Multiple Data Sources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Jia Lu & Xiaoyi Cao & Sheng Zhong, 2018. "A likelihood approach to testing hypotheses on the co-evolution of epigenome and genome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Saeed Omidi & Mihaela Zavolan & Mikhail Pachkov & Jeremie Breda & Severin Berger & Erik van Nimwegen, 2017. "Automated incorporation of pairwise dependency in transcription factor binding site prediction using dinucleotide weight tensors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Timothy E Reddy & Charles DeLisi & Boris E Shakhnovich, 2007. "Binding Site Graphs: A New Graph Theoretical Framework for Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding Sites," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Siewert Elizabeth A & Kechris Katerina J, 2009. "Prediction of Motifs Based on a Repeated-Measures Model for Integrating Cross-Species Sequence and Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-34, September.
    7. Kenzie D MacIsaac & Ernest Fraenkel, 2006. "Practical Strategies for Discovering Regulatory DNA Sequence Motifs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(4), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0095148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.