IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0088378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Distribution of Sex Acts and Condom Use within Partnerships in a Rural Sub-Saharan African Population

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Smith
  • Constance Nyamukapa
  • Simon Gregson
  • James Lewis
  • Sitholubuhle Magutshwa
  • Christina Schumacher
  • Phyllis Mushati
  • Tim Hallett
  • Geoff Garnett

Abstract

Introduction: In an HIV/AIDS epidemic driven primarily by heterosexual transmission, it is important to have an understanding of the human sexual behaviour patterns that influence transmission. We analysed the distribution and predictors of within-partnership sexual behaviour and condom use in rural Zimbabwe and generated parameters for use in future modelling analyses. Methods: A population-based cohort was recruited from a household census in 12 communities. A baseline survey was carried out in 1998–2000 with follow-up surveys after 3 and 5 years. Statistical distributions were fitted to reported within-partnership numbers of total, unprotected and protected sex acts in the past two weeks. Multilevel linear and logistic regression models were constructed to assess predictors of the frequency of unprotected sex and consistent condom use. Results: A normal distribution of ln(sex acts+1) provided the best fit for total and unprotected sex acts for men and women. A negative binomial distribution applied to the untransformed data provided the best fit for protected sex acts. Condom use within partnerships was predominantly bimodal with at least 88% reporting zero or 100% use. Both men and women reported fewer unprotected sex acts with non-regular compared to regular partners (men: 0.26 fewer every two weeks (95% confidence interval 0.18–0.34); women: 0.16 (0.07–0.23)). Never and previously married individuals reported fewer unprotected sex acts than currently married individuals (never married men: 0.64 (0.60–0.67); previously married men: 0.59 (0.50–0.67); never married women: 0.51 (0.45–0.57); previously married women: 0.42 (0.37–0.47)). These variables were also associated with more consistent condom use. Discussion: We generated parameters that will be useful for defining transmission models of HIV and other STIs, which rely on a valid representation of the underlying sexual network that determines spread of an infection. This will enable a better understanding of the spread of HIV and other STDs in this rural sub-Saharan population.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Smith & Constance Nyamukapa & Simon Gregson & James Lewis & Sitholubuhle Magutshwa & Christina Schumacher & Phyllis Mushati & Tim Hallett & Geoff Garnett, 2014. "The Distribution of Sex Acts and Condom Use within Partnerships in a Rural Sub-Saharan African Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088378
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088378&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0088378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Niyukuri & Trust Chibawara & Peter Suwirakwenda Nyasulu & Wim Delva, 2021. "Inferring HIV Transmission Network Determinants Using Agent-Based Models Calibrated to Multi-Data Sources," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-33, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.