IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0083595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Insights into Measurement Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Fields from Computer Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Richard A Russell
  • David F Garway-Heath
  • David P Crabb

Abstract

Objective: To develop a model to simulate visual fields (VFs) in glaucoma patients, and to characterize variability of the Mean Deviation (MD) VF summary measurement using real VFs and simulations. Methods: Pointwise VF variability was previously approximated using longitudinal VF data (24–2 SITA Standard, Humphrey Field Analyzer) from 2,736 patients; these data were used to build a non-parametric model to simulate VFs. One million VF simulations were generated from 1,000 VFs (1,000 simulations per ‘ground-truth’ VF), and the variability of simulated MDs was characterized as a function of ground-truth MD and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD). Results: The median (interquartile range, IQR) patient age and MD was 66 (56 to 75) years and −3.5 (−8.3 to −1.1) decibels, respectively. The inferred variability as a function of ground-truth MD and PSD indicated that variability, on average, increased rapidly as glaucoma worsened. However, the pattern of VF damage significantly affects the level of MD variability, with more than three-fold differences between patients with approximately the same levels of MD but different patterns of loss. Conclusions: A novel approach for simulating VFs is introduced. A better understanding of VF variability will help clinicians to differentiate real VF progression from measurement variability. This study highlights that, overall, MD variability increases as the level of damage increases, but variability is highly dependent on the pattern of VF damage. Future research, using VF simulations, could be employed to provide benchmarks for measuring the performance of VF progression detection algorithms and developing new strategies for measuring VF progression.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard A Russell & David F Garway-Heath & David P Crabb, 2013. "New Insights into Measurement Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Fields from Computer Modelling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0083595
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0083595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0083595&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0083595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroshi Murata & Hiroyo Hirasawa & Yuka Aoyama & Kenji Sugisaki & Makoto Araie & Chihiro Mayama & Makoto Aihara & Ryo Asaoka, 2013. "Identifying Areas of the Visual Field Important for Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isaac A. Jones & Mark P. Van Oyen & Mariel S. Lavieri & Christopher A. Andrews & Joshua D. Stein, 2021. "Predicting rapid progression phases in glaucoma using a soft voting ensemble classifier exploiting Kalman filtering," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 686-701, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenya Yuki & Ryo Asaoka & Kazuo Tsubota, 2014. "The Relationship between Central Visual Field Damage and Motor Vehicle Collisions in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0083595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.