IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0082773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TP53 and MDM2 Gene Polymorphisms, Gene-Gene Interaction, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: Evidence from an Updated Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qiliu Peng
  • Xianjun Lao
  • Zhiping Chen
  • Hao Lai
  • Yan Deng
  • Jian Wang
  • Cuiju Mo
  • Jingzhe Sui
  • Junrong Wu
  • Limin Zhai
  • Shi Yang
  • Xue Qin
  • Shan Li

Abstract

Background: The association between TP53 R72P and/or MDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk has been widely reported, but results were inconsistent. To clarify the effects of these polymorphisms on HCC risk, an updated meta-analysis of all available studies was conducted. Methods: Eligible articles were identified by search of databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) for the period up to July 2013. Data were extracted by two independent authors and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Metaregression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. Results: Finally, a total of 10 studies including 2,243 cases and 3,615 controls were available for MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and 14 studies containing 4,855 cases and 6,630 controls were included for TP53 R72P polymorphism. With respect to MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism, significantly increased HCC risk was found in the overall population. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity and hepatitis virus infection status, significantly increased HCC risk was found in Asians, Caucasians, Africans, and HCV positive patients. With respect to TP53 R72P polymorphism, no significant association with HCC risk was observed in the overall and subgroup analyses. In the MDM2 SNP309–TP53 R72P interaction analysis, we found that subjects with MDM2 309TT and TP53 Pro/Pro genotype, MDM2 309 TG and TP53 Arg/Pro genotype, and MDM2 309 GG and TP53 Pro/Pro genotype were associated with significantly increased risk of developing HCC as compared with the reference MDM2 309TT and TP53 Arg/Arg genotype. Conclusions: We concluded that MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism may play an important role in the carcinogenesis of HCC. In addition, our findings further suggest that the combination of MDM2 SNP 309 and TP53 Arg72Pro genotypes confers higher risk to develop HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this association.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiliu Peng & Xianjun Lao & Zhiping Chen & Hao Lai & Yan Deng & Jian Wang & Cuiju Mo & Jingzhe Sui & Junrong Wu & Limin Zhai & Shi Yang & Xue Qin & Shan Li, 2013. "TP53 and MDM2 Gene Polymorphisms, Gene-Gene Interaction, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: Evidence from an Updated Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082773
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082773&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0082773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.