IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0082212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Elevated Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Based on Magnetic Resonance 4D Velocity Mapping: Comparison of Visualization Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Ursula Reiter
  • Gert Reiter
  • Gabor Kovacs
  • Aurelien F Stalder
  • Mehmet A Gulsun
  • Andreas Greiser
  • Horst Olschewski
  • Michael Fuchsjäger

Abstract

Purpose: Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (PC-MRI) allows non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and estimation of elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) based on vortical motion of blood in the main pulmonary artery. The purpose of the present study was to compare the presence and duration of PH-associated vortices derived from different flow visualization techniques with special respect to their performance for non-invasive assessment of elevated mPAP and diagnosis of PH. Methods: Fifty patients with suspected PH (23 patients with and 27 without PH) were investigated by right heart catheterization and time-resolved PC-MRI of the main pulmonary artery. PC-MRI data were visualized with dedicated prototype software, providing 3D vector, multi-planar reformatted (MPR) 2D vector, streamline, and particle trace representation of flow patterns. Persistence of PH-associated vortical blood flow (tvortex) was evaluated with all visualization techniques. Dependencies of tvortex on visualization techniques were analyzed by means of correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: tvortex values from 3D vector visualization correlated strongly with those from other visualization techniques (r = 0.98, 0.98 and 0.97 for MPR, streamline and particle trace visualization, respectively). Areas under ROC curves for diagnosis of PH based on tvortex did not differ significantly and were 0.998 for 3D vector, MPR vector and particle trace visualization and 0.999 for streamline visualization. Correlations between elevated mPAP and tvortex in patients with PH were r = 0.96, 0.93, 0.95 and 0.92 for 3D vector, MPR vector, streamline and particle trace visualization, respectively. Corresponding standard deviations from the linear regression lines ranged between 3 and 4 mmHg. Conclusion: 3D vector, MPR vector, streamline as well as particle trace visualization of time-resolved 3D PC-MRI data of the main pulmonary artery can be employed for accurate vortex-based diagnosis of PH and estimation of elevated mPAP.

Suggested Citation

  • Ursula Reiter & Gert Reiter & Gabor Kovacs & Aurelien F Stalder & Mehmet A Gulsun & Andreas Greiser & Horst Olschewski & Michael Fuchsjäger, 2013. "Evaluation of Elevated Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Based on Magnetic Resonance 4D Velocity Mapping: Comparison of Visualization Techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082212
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082212&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0082212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.