IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0080704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Effective Model for Screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Large-Scale Diagnostic Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jianyin Zou
  • Jian Guan
  • Hongliang Yi
  • Lili Meng
  • Yuanping Xiong
  • Xulan Tang
  • Kaiming Su
  • Shankai Yin

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes high morbidity and mortality and is independently associated with an increased likelihood of multiple complications. The diagnosis of OSA is presently time-consuming, labor-intensive and inaccessible. Aim: This study sought to develop a simple and efficient model for identifying OSA in Chinese adult population. Methods: In this study, the efficiency of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and a new established prediction model for screening OSA were evaluated in the test cohort (2,032 participants) and confirmed in an independent validation cohort (784 participants). Results: In the test cohort, a high specificity (82.77%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.36–87.35) and a moderate sensitivity (61.65%, 95% CI, 59.35–63.91) were obtained at the threshold of nine for the ESS alone. Notably, sex-stratified analysis revealed different optimum cut-off points: nine for males and six for females. The new generated screening model, including age, waist circumference, ESS score, and minimum oxygen saturation (SaO2) as independent variables, revealed a higher sensitivity (89.13%, 95% CI, 87.60–90.53) and specificity (90.34%, 95% CI, 85.85–93.77) at the best cut-off point. Through receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the model was found significantly larger than that of the ESS alone (0.955 vs. 0.774, P

Suggested Citation

  • Jianyin Zou & Jian Guan & Hongliang Yi & Lili Meng & Yuanping Xiong & Xulan Tang & Kaiming Su & Shankai Yin, 2013. "An Effective Model for Screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Large-Scale Diagnostic Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0080704
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080704&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0080704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0080704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.