IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0062278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Furley
  • Daniel Memmert

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the predictions of the biased competition theory of selective attention in a computer based sport task. According to this theory objects held in the circuitry of working memory (WM) automatically bias attention to objects in a visual scene that match or are related to the WM representation. Specifically, we investigated whether certain players that are activated in the circuitry of WM automatically draw attention and receive a competitive advantage in a computer based sport task. In all three experiments participants had to hold an image of a certain player in WM while engaged in a speeded sport task. In Experiment 1 participants had to identify as quickly as possible which player was in possession of the ball. In Experiment 2 and 3 participants had to decide to which player they would pass to in a cartoon team handball situation and a photo picture basketball situation. The results support the biased competition theory of selective attention and suggest that certain decision options receive a competitive advantage if they are associated with the activated contents in the circuitry of WM and that this effect is more pronounced when more decision options compete for attention. A further extension compared to previous research was that the contents of working memory not only biased attention but also actual decisions that can lead to passing errors in sport. We critically discuss the applied implications of the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Furley & Daniel Memmert, 2013. "“Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062278
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062278&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0062278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ed Yong, 2012. "Replication studies: Bad copy," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 298-300, May.
    2. Arthur F. Kramer & Sowon Hahn & Neal J. Cohen & Marie T. Banich & Edward McAuley & Catherine R. Harrison & Julie Chason & Eli Vakil & Lynn Bardell & Richard A. Boileau & Angela Colcombe, 1999. "Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6743), pages 418-419, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sogand Poureghbali & Jorge Arede & Kathrin Rehfeld & Wolfgang Schöllhorn & Nuno Leite, 2020. "Want to Impact Physical, Technical, and Tactical Performance during Basketball Small-Sided Games in Youth Athletes? Try Differential Learning Beforehand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette N. Brown & Drew B. Cameron & Benjamin D. K. Wood, 2014. "Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 215-235, September.
    2. Christopher Boyce & Mikolaj Czajkowski & Nick Hanley & Charles Noussair & Michael Townsend & Steve Tucker, 2015. "The effects of emotions on preferences and choices for public goods," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2015-08, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    3. Ursula Staudinger, 2006. "Konsequenzen des demographischen Wandels für betriebliche Handlungsfelder: eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 690-698, August.
    4. Keita Kamijo & Seongryu Bae & Hiroaki Masaki, 2016. "The Association of Childhood Fitness to Proactive and Reactive Action Monitoring," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Michael J Weir & Catherine M Ashcraft & Natallia Leuchanka Diessner & Bridie McGreavy & Emily Vogler & Todd Guilfoos, 2020. "Language effects on bargaining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Ellen Carl & Alina Shevorykin & Amylynn Liskiewicz & Ronald Alberico & Ahmed Belal & Martin Mahoney & Elizabeth Bouchard & Andrew Ray & Christine E. Sheffer, 2021. "Increasing Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Survivors by Modulating Temporal Orientation with rTMS: Feasibility and Potential Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Gregory Owen Thomas & Wouter Poortinga & Elena Sautkina, 2016. "Habit Discontinuity, Self-Activation, and the Diminishing Influence of Context Change: Evidence from the UK Understanding Society Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Liya Xu & Hongyi Gu & Xiaowan Cai & Yimin Zhang & Xiao Hou & Jingjing Yu & Tingting Sun, 2023. "The Effects of Exercise for Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Dong, Yizhe & Duan, Tinghua & Hou, Wenxuan & Liu, Yue (Lucy), 2019. "Athletes in boardrooms: Evidence from the world," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 165-183.
    10. Nick Hanley & Christopher Boyce & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Steve Tucker & Charles Noussair & Michael Townsend, 2017. "Sad or Happy? The Effects of Emotions on Stated Preferences for Environmental Goods," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(4), pages 821-846, December.
    11. Jean de Dieu Habyarimana & Etienne Tugirumukiza & Ke Zhou, 2022. "Physical Education and Sports: A Backbone of the Entire Community in the Twenty-First Century," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Laurent, Gilles, 2013. "EMAC Distinguished Marketing Scholar 2012," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 323-334.
    13. Blakeley B. McShane & David Gal, 2016. "Blinding Us to the Obvious? The Effect of Statistical Training on the Evaluation of Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1707-1718, June.
    14. Alejandro Sabarit & Rafael E. Reigal & Juan P. Morillo-Baro & Rocío Juárez-Ruiz de Mier & Auxiliadora Franquelo & Antonio Hernández-Mendo & Coral Falcó & Verónica Morales-Sánchez, 2020. "Cognitive Functioning, Physical Fitness, and Game Performance in a Sample of Adolescent Soccer Players," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Roman Goenarjo & Laurent Bosquet & Nicolas Berryman & Valentine Metier & Anaick Perrochon & Sarah Anne Fraser & Olivier Dupuy, 2020. "Cerebral Oxygenation Reserve: The Relationship Between Physical Activity Level and the Cognitive Load During a Stroop Task in Healthy Young Males," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Rafael Ballester & Florentino Huertas & Francisco Javier Yuste & Francesc Llorens & Daniel Sanabria, 2015. "The Relationship between Regular Sports Participation and Vigilance in Male and Female Adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2013. "Improving Causal Inferences in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(10), pages 1762-1771, October.
    18. Santiago Sanchez-Pages & Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz & Enrique Turiegano, 2014. "Facial Masculinity: How the Choice of Measurement Method Enables to Detect Its Influence on Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    19. Macarena Sánchez-Izquierdo & Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros, 2021. "Cognition in Healthy Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Kenneth Manton & Igor Akushevich & Alexander Kulminski, 2008. "Human Mortality at Extreme Ages: Data from the NLTCS and Linked Medicare Records," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 137-159.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.