IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0060635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Centola
  • Guy Cavet
  • Yijing Shen
  • Saroja Ramanujan
  • Nicholas Knowlton
  • Kathryn A Swan
  • Mary Turner
  • Chris Sutton
  • Dustin R Smith
  • Douglas J Haney
  • David Chernoff
  • Lyndal K Hesterberg
  • John P Carulli
  • Peter C Taylor
  • Nancy A Shadick
  • Michael E Weinblatt
  • Jeffrey R Curtis

Abstract

Background: Disease activity measurement is a key component of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Biomarkers that capture the complex and heterogeneous biology of RA have the potential to complement clinical disease activity assessment. Objectives: To develop a multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test for rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: Candidate serum protein biomarkers were selected from extensive literature screens, bioinformatics databases, mRNA expression and protein microarray data. Quantitative assays were identified and optimized for measuring candidate biomarkers in RA patient sera. Biomarkers with qualifying assays were prioritized in a series of studies based on their correlations to RA clinical disease activity (e.g. the Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein [DAS28-CRP], a validated metric commonly used in clinical trials) and their contributions to multivariate models. Prioritized biomarkers were used to train an algorithm to measure disease activity, assessed by correlation to DAS and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for classification of low vs. moderate/high disease activity. The effect of comorbidities on the MBDA score was evaluated using linear models with adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: 130 candidate biomarkers were tested in feasibility studies and 25 were selected for algorithm training. Multi-biomarker statistical models outperformed individual biomarkers at estimating disease activity. Biomarker-based scores were significantly correlated with DAS28-CRP and could discriminate patients with low vs. moderate/high clinical disease activity. Such scores were also able to track changes in DAS28-CRP and were significantly associated with both joint inflammation measured by ultrasound and damage progression measured by radiography. The final MBDA algorithm uses 12 biomarkers to generate an MBDA score between 1 and 100. No significant effects on the MBDA score were found for common comorbidities. Conclusion: We followed a stepwise approach to develop a quantitative serum-based measure of RA disease activity, based on 12-biomarkers, which was consistently associated with clinical disease activity levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Centola & Guy Cavet & Yijing Shen & Saroja Ramanujan & Nicholas Knowlton & Kathryn A Swan & Mary Turner & Chris Sutton & Dustin R Smith & Douglas J Haney & David Chernoff & Lyndal K Hesterberg, 2013. "Development of a Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0060635
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060635&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0060635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0060635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.