IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0048885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Australian Baby Bonus Maternity Payment and Birth Characteristics in Western Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Kristjana Einarsdóttir
  • Amanda Langridge
  • Geoffrey Hammond
  • Anthony S Gunnell
  • Fatima A Haggar
  • Fiona J Stanley

Abstract

Background: The Australian baby bonus maternity payment introduced in 2004 has been reported to have successfully increased fertility rates in Australia. We aimed to investigate the influence of the baby bonus on maternal demographics and birth characteristics in Western Australia (WA). Methods and Findings: This study included 200,659 birth admissions from WA during 2001–2008, identified from administrative birth and hospital data-systems held by the WA Department of Health. We estimated average quarterly birth rates after the baby bonus introduction and compared them with expected rates had the policy not occurred. Rate and percentage differences (including 95% confidence intervals) were estimated separately by maternal demographics and birth characteristics. WA birth rates increased by 12.8% following the baby bonus implementation with the greatest increase being in mothers aged 20–24 years (26.3%, 95%CI = 22.0,30.6), mothers having their third (1.6%, 95%CI = 0.9,2.4) or fourth child (2.2%, 95%CI = 2.1,2.4), mothers living in outer regional and remote areas (32.4%, 95%CI = 30.2,34.6), mothers giving birth as public patients (1.5%, 95%CI = 1.3,1.8), and mothers giving birth in public hospitals (3.5%, 95%CI = 2.6,4.5). Interestingly, births to private patients (−4.3%, 95%CI = −4.8,−3.7) and births in private hospitals (−6.3%, 95%CI = −6.8,−5.8) decreased following the policy implementation. Conclusions: The introduction of the baby bonus maternity payment may have served as an incentive for women in their early twenties and mothers having their third or fourth child and may have contributed to the ongoing pressure and staff shortages in Australian public hospitals, particularly those in outer regional and remote areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristjana Einarsdóttir & Amanda Langridge & Geoffrey Hammond & Anthony S Gunnell & Fatima A Haggar & Fiona J Stanley, 2012. "The Australian Baby Bonus Maternity Payment and Birth Characteristics in Western Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-5, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048885
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048885
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048885&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0048885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristjana Einarsdóttir & Anna Kemp & Fatima A Haggar & Rachael E Moorin & Anthony S Gunnell & David B Preen & Fiona J Stanley & C D’Arcy J Holman, 2012. "Increase in Caesarean Deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive Policy Reforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-5, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengni Chen & Chris J Lloyd & Paul S F Yip, 2018. "A new method of identifying target groups for pronatalist policy applied to Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judith Liu & Yuting Zhang, 2023. "Elderly responses to private health insurance incentives: Evidence from Australia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(12), pages 2730-2744, December.
    2. Iqbal Anwar & Herfina Y Nababan & Shabnam Mostari & Aminur Rahman & Jahangir A M Khan, 2015. "Trends and Inequities in Use of Maternal Health Care Services in Bangladesh, 1991-2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Fatemeh Bakhtari & Haidar Nadrian & Hossein Matlabi & Parvin Sarbakhsh & Maryam Bidar, 2019. "Personal, Interpersonal, and Organizational Predictors of the Mode of Delivery Among Urban Women: A Prospective Study With Socio-Ecological Approach," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(3), pages 280-297, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.