IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0036231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic Rules of Mechano-Regulation Combined with Subject Specific Loading Conditions Can Explain Bone Adaptation after THA

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz D Szwedowski
  • William R Taylor
  • Markus O Heller
  • Carsten Perka
  • Michael Müller
  • Georg N Duda

Abstract

Bone adaptation after total hip arthroplasty is associated with the change in internal load environment, and can result in compromised bone stock, which presents a considerable challenge should a revision procedure be required. Under the assumption of a generic mechano-regulatory algorithm for governing bone adaptation, the aim of this study was to understand the contribution of subject specific loading conditions towards explaining the local periprosthetic remodelling variations in patients. CT scans of 3 consecutive THA patients were obtained and used for the construction of subject specific finite element models using verified musculoskeletal loading and physiological boundary conditions. Using either strain energy density or equivalent strain as mechano-transduction signals, predictions of bone adaptation were compared to DEXA derived BMD changes from 7 days to 12 months post-implantation. Individual changes in BMD of up to 33.6% were observed within the 12 month follow-up period, together with considerable inter-patient variability of up to 26%. Estimates of bone adaptation using equivalent strain and balanced loading conditions led to the best agreement with in vivo measured BMD, with RMS errors of only 3.9%, 7.3% and 7.3% for the individual subjects, compared to errors of over 10% when the loading conditions were simplified. This study provides evidence that subject specific loading conditions and physiological boundary constraints are essential for explaining inter-patient variations in bone adaptation patterns. This improved knowledge of the rules governing the adaptation of bone following THA helps towards understanding the interplay between mechanics and biology for better identifying patients at risk of excessive or problematic periprosthetic bone atrophy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz D Szwedowski & William R Taylor & Markus O Heller & Carsten Perka & Michael Müller & Georg N Duda, 2012. "Generic Rules of Mechano-Regulation Combined with Subject Specific Loading Conditions Can Explain Bone Adaptation after THA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036231
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036231
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036231&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0036231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Myriam Cilla & Edoardo Borgiani & Javier Martínez & Georg N Duda & Sara Checa, 2017. "Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: Application to a short-stem hip implant," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Mariska Wesseling & Friedl De Groote & Christophe Meyer & Kristoff Corten & Jean-Pierre Simon & Kaat Desloovere & Ilse Jonkers, 2016. "Subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling in patients before and after total hip arthroplasty," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(15), pages 1683-1691, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.