IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0034112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hormone Treatment, Estrogen Receptor Polymorphisms and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne Ryan
  • Marianne Canonico
  • Laure Carcaillon
  • Isabelle Carrière
  • Jacqueline Scali
  • Jean-Francois Dartigues
  • Carole Dufouil
  • Karen Ritchie
  • Pierre-Yves Scarabin
  • Marie-Laure Ancelin

Abstract

Background: The association between hormone treatment (HT) and mortality remains controversial. This study aimed to determine whether the risk of mortality associated with HT use varies depending on the specific characteristics of treatment and genetic variability in terms of the estrogen receptor. Methodology/Principal Findings: A prospective, population-based study of 5135 women aged 65 years and older who were recruited from three cities in France and followed over six years. Detailed information related to HT use was obtained and five estrogen receptor polymorphisms were genotyped. The total follow-up was 25,436 person-years and during this time 352 women died. Cancer (36.4%) and cardiovascular disease (19.3%) were the major causes of death. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, education, centre, living situation, comorbidity, depression, physical and mental incapacities, indicated no significant association between HT and mortality, regardless of the type or duration of treatment, or the age at initiation. However, the association between HT and all-cause or cancer-related mortality varied across women, with significant interactions identified with three estrogen receptor polymorphisms (p-values = 0.004 to 0.03) in adjusted analyses. Women carrying the C allele of ESR1 rs2234693 had a decreased risk of all-cause mortality with HT (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18–0.97), while in stark contrast, those homozygous for the T allele had a significantly increased risk of cancer-related mortality (HR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.23–8.20). The findings were similar for ESR1 rs9340799 and ESR2 rs1271572. Conclusions/Significance: The risk of mortality was not associated with HT duration, type or age at initiation. It was however not equal across all women, with some women appearing genetically more vulnerable to the effects of HT in terms of their estrogen receptor genotype. These findings, if confirmed in another independent study, may help explain the differential susceptibility of women to the beneficial or adverse effects of HT.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne Ryan & Marianne Canonico & Laure Carcaillon & Isabelle Carrière & Jacqueline Scali & Jean-Francois Dartigues & Carole Dufouil & Karen Ritchie & Pierre-Yves Scarabin & Marie-Laure Ancelin, 2012. "Hormone Treatment, Estrogen Receptor Polymorphisms and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0034112
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034112&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0034112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0034112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.