IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0029628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Optimal Control Theory and Molecular Dynamics for Protein Folding

Author

Listed:
  • Yaman Arkun
  • Mert Gur

Abstract

A new method to develop low-energy folding routes for proteins is presented. The novel aspect of the proposed approach is the synergistic use of optimal control theory with Molecular Dynamics (MD). In the first step of the method, optimal control theory is employed to compute the force field and the optimal folding trajectory for the atoms of a Coarse-Grained (CG) protein model. The solution of this CG optimization provides an harmonic approximation of the true potential energy surface around the native state. In the next step CG optimization guides the MD simulation by specifying the optimal target positions for the atoms. In turn, MD simulation provides an all-atom conformation whose positions match closely the reference target positions determined by CG optimization. This is accomplished by Targeted Molecular Dynamics (TMD) which uses a bias potential or harmonic restraint in addition to the usual MD potential. Folding is a dynamical process and as such residues make different contacts during the course of folding. Therefore CG optimization has to be reinitialized and repeated over time to accomodate these important changes. At each sampled folding time, the active contacts among the residues are recalculated based on the all-atom conformation obtained from MD. Using the new set of contacts, the CG potential is updated and the CG optimal trajectory for the atoms is recomputed. This is followed by MD. Implementation of this repetitive CG optimization - MD simulation cycle generates the folding trajectory. Simulations on a model protein Villin demonstrate the utility of the method. Since the method is founded on the general tools of optimal control theory and MD without any restrictions, it is widely applicable to other systems. It can be easily implemented with available MD software packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaman Arkun & Mert Gur, 2012. "Combining Optimal Control Theory and Molecular Dynamics for Protein Folding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029628
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029628&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0029628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaman Arkun & Burak Erman, 2010. "Prediction of Optimal Folding Routes of Proteins That Satisfy the Principle of Lowest Entropy Loss: Dynamic Contact Maps and Optimal Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. David Baker, 2000. "A surprising simplicity to protein folding," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6782), pages 39-42, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Zamuner & Flavio Seno & Antonio Trovato, 2022. "Statistical potentials from the Gaussian scaling behaviour of chain fragments buried within protein globules," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Seth Lichter & Benjamin Rafferty & Zachary Flohr & Ashlie Martini, 2012. "Protein High-Force Pulling Simulations Yield Low-Force Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Amit K Chattopadhyay & Biswajit Debnath & Rihab El-Hassani & Sadhan Kumar Ghosh & Rahul Baidya, 2020. "Cleaner Production in Optimized Multivariate Networks: Operations Management through a Roll of Dice," Papers 2003.00884, arXiv.org.
    4. Omar Haq & Michael Andrec & Alexandre V Morozov & Ronald M Levy, 2012. "Correlated Electrostatic Mutations Provide a Reservoir of Stability in HIV Protease," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Marwa Mohammed M. Ghareeb & Ahmed Sharaf Eldin & Taysir Hassan A. Soliman & Mohammed Ebrahim Marie, 2013. "A Deeply Glimpse into Protein Fold Recognition," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(06), pages 24-33, June.
    6. Yaman Arkun & Burak Erman, 2010. "Prediction of Optimal Folding Routes of Proteins That Satisfy the Principle of Lowest Entropy Loss: Dynamic Contact Maps and Optimal Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Christopher A Brown & Kevin S Brown, 2010. "Validation of Coevolving Residue Algorithms via Pipeline Sensitivity Analysis: ELSC and OMES and ZNMI, Oh My!," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.