IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0006365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Local Public Health Workers' Willingness to Respond to Pandemic Influenza through Application of the Extended Parallel Process Model

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J Barnett
  • Ran D Balicer
  • Carol B Thompson
  • J Douglas Storey
  • Saad B Omer
  • Natalie L Semon
  • Steve Bayer
  • Lorraine V Cheek
  • Kerry W Gateley
  • Kathryn M Lanza
  • Jane A Norbin
  • Catherine C Slemp
  • Jonathan M Links

Abstract

Background: Local public health agencies play a central role in response to an influenza pandemic, and understanding the willingness of their employees to report to work is therefore a critically relevant concern for pandemic influenza planning efforts. Witte's Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) has been found useful for understanding adaptive behavior in the face of unknown risk, and thus offers a framework for examining scenario-specific willingness to respond among local public health workers. We thus aim to use the EPPM as a lens for examining the influences of perceived threat and efficacy on local public health workers' response willingness to pandemic influenza. Methodology/Principal Findings: We administered an online, EPPM-based survey about attitudes/beliefs toward emergency response (Johns Hopkins∼Public Health Infrastructure Response Survey Tool), to local public health employees in three states between November 2006 – December 2007. A total of 1835 responses were collected for an overall response rate of 83%. With some regional variation, overall 16% of the workers in 2006-7 were not willing to “respond to a pandemic flu emergency regardless of its severity”. Local health department employees with a perception of high threat and high efficacy – i.e., those fitting a ‘concerned and confident’ profile in the EPPM analysis – had the highest declared rates of willingness to respond to an influenza pandemic if required by their agency, which was 31.7 times higher than those fitting a ‘low threat/low efficacy’ EPPM profile. Conclusions/Significance: In the context of pandemic influenza planning, the EPPM provides a useful framework to inform nuanced understanding of baseline levels of – and gaps in – local public health workers' response willingness. Within local health departments, ‘concerned and confident’ employees are most likely to be willing to respond. This finding may allow public health agencies to design, implement, and evaluate training programs focused on emergency response attitudes in health departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J Barnett & Ran D Balicer & Carol B Thompson & J Douglas Storey & Saad B Omer & Natalie L Semon & Steve Bayer & Lorraine V Cheek & Kerry W Gateley & Kathryn M Lanza & Jane A Norbin & Catherine , 2009. "Assessment of Local Public Health Workers' Willingness to Respond to Pandemic Influenza through Application of the Extended Parallel Process Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006365
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006365&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0006365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran D Balicer & Christina L Catlett & Daniel J Barnett & Carol B Thompson & Edbert B Hsu & Melinda J Morton & Natalie L Semon & Christopher M Watson & Howard S Gwon & Jonathan M Links, 2011. "Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Yasmin Khan & Adalsteinn D Brown & Anna R Gagliardi & Tracey O’Sullivan & Sara Lacarte & Bonnie Henry & Brian Schwartz, 2019. "Are we prepared? The development of performance indicators for public health emergency preparedness using a modified Delphi approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Bismark Adu-Gyamfi & Rajib Shaw, 2022. "Risk Awareness and Impediments to Disaster Preparedness of Foreign Residents in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Dionne, Georges & Desjardins, Denise & Lebeau, Martin & Messier, Stéphane & Dascal, André, 2014. "Health care workers’ risk perceptions of personal and work activities and willingness to report for work during an influenza pandemic," Working Papers 14-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    5. Samane Shirahmadi & Shabnam Seyedzadeh-Sabounchi & Salman Khazaei & Saeid Bashirian & Amir Farhang Miresmæili & Zeinab Bayat & Behzad Houshmand & Hasan Semyari & Majid Barati & Ensiyeh Jenabi & Fakhre, 2020. "Fear control and danger control amid COVID-19 dental crisis: Application of the Extended Parallel Process Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.