IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0004087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Response to Smallpox Vaccine in Preimmunized Volunteers

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Bossi
  • Frédérick Gay
  • Imène Fouzai
  • Béhazine Combadière
  • Geneviève Brousse
  • Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
  • Jean-Marc Crance
  • Brigitte Autran
  • Daniel Garin
  • for the IMMUVAR group

Abstract

Context: In March 2003, the French Ministry of Health implemented a program on preparedness and response to a biological attack using smallpox as weapon. This program included the establishment of a preoutbreak national team that could be revaccinated against smallpox. Objective: To identify demographic and clinical factors associated with vaccination success defined as the presence of a pustule at the inoculation site at day 8 (days 7–9), with an undiluted vaccinia virus derived from a Lister strain among preimmunized volunteers. Volunteers and Methods: From March 2003 to November 2006, we have studied prospectively 226 eligible volunteers. Demographic data were recorded for each volunteer (age, sex, number of previously smallpox vaccinations and date of the last vaccination). Smallpox vaccine adverse reactions were diagnosed on the basis of clinical examination performed at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after revaccination. Results: A total of 226 volunteers (sex ratio H/F = 2.7) were revaccinated. Median age was 45 years (range: 27–63 yrs). All volunteers completed follow-up. Median number of vaccinations before revaccination was 2 (range: 1–8). The median delay between time of the study and the last vaccination was 29 years (range; 18–60 yrs). Sixty-one volunteers (27%) experienced one (n = 40) or more (n = 21) minor side effects during the 2–14 days after revaccination. Successful vaccination was noted in 216/226 volunteers (95.6%) at day 8 and the median of the pustule diameter was 5 mm (range: 1–20 mm). Size of the pustule at day 8 was correlated with age (p = 0.03) and with the presence of axillary adenopathy after revaccination (p = 0.007). Sex, number of prior vaccinations, delay between the last vaccination and revaccination, and local or systemic side effects with the exception of axillary adenopathy, were not correlated with the size of the pustule at day 8. Conclusions: Previously vaccinated volunteers can be successfully revaccinated with the Lister strain.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Bossi & Frédérick Gay & Imène Fouzai & Béhazine Combadière & Geneviève Brousse & Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes & Jean-Marc Crance & Brigitte Autran & Daniel Garin & for the IMMUVAR group, 2008. "Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Response to Smallpox Vaccine in Preimmunized Volunteers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-4, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0004087
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004087&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0004087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0004087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.