IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cellular Islet Autoimmunity Associates with Clinical Outcome of Islet Cell Transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Volkert A L Huurman
  • Robert Hilbrands
  • Gabriëlle G M Pinkse
  • Pieter Gillard
  • Gaby Duinkerken
  • Pieter van de Linde
  • Petronella M W van der Meer-Prins
  • Minke F J Versteeg-van der Voort Maarschalk
  • Koen Verbeeck
  • Behrooz Z Alizadeh
  • Chantal Mathieu
  • Frans K Gorus
  • Dave L Roelen
  • Frans H J Claas
  • Bart Keymeulen
  • Daniel G Pipeleers
  • Bart O Roep

Abstract

Background: Islet cell transplantation can cure type 1 diabetes (T1D), but only a minority of recipients remains insulin–independent in the following years. We tested the hypothesis that allograft rejection and recurrent autoimmunity contribute to this progressive loss of islet allograft function. Methodology/Principal Findings: Twenty-one T1D patients received cultured islet cell grafts prepared from multiple donors and transplanted under anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) maintenance immunosuppression. Immunity against auto- and alloantigens was measured before and during one year after transplantation. Cellular auto- and alloreactivity was assessed by lymphocyte stimulation tests against autoantigens and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor assays, respectively. Humoral reactivity was measured by auto- and alloantibodies. Clinical outcome parameters - including time until insulin independence, insulin independence at one year, and C-peptide levels over one year- remained blinded until their correlation with immunological parameters. All patients showed significant improvement of metabolic control and 13 out of 21 became insulin-independent. Multivariate analyses showed that presence of cellular autoimmunity before and after transplantation is associated with delayed insulin-independence (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) and lower circulating C-peptide levels during the first year after transplantation (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). Seven out of eight patients without pre-existent T-cell autoreactivity became insulin-independent, versus none of the four patients reactive to both islet autoantigens GAD and IA-2 before transplantation. Autoantibody levels and cellular alloreactivity had no significant association with outcome. Conclusions/Significance: In this cohort study, cellular islet-specific autoimmunity associates with clinical outcome of islet cell transplantation under ATG-tacrolimus-MMF immunosuppression. Tailored immunotherapy targeting cellular islet autoreactivity may be required. Monitoring cellular immune reactivity can be useful to identify factors influencing graft survival and to assess efficacy of immunosuppression. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00623610

Suggested Citation

  • Volkert A L Huurman & Robert Hilbrands & Gabriëlle G M Pinkse & Pieter Gillard & Gaby Duinkerken & Pieter van de Linde & Petronella M W van der Meer-Prins & Minke F J Versteeg-van der Voort Maarschalk, 2008. "Cellular Islet Autoimmunity Associates with Clinical Outcome of Islet Cell Transplantation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002435
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002435&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.