IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Bivalent Killed, Whole-Cell, Oral Cholera Vaccine in Adults and Children in a Cholera Endemic Area in Kolkata, India

Author

Listed:
  • Dilip Mahalanabis
  • Anna Lena Lopez
  • Dipika Sur
  • Jacqueline Deen
  • Byomkesh Manna
  • Suman Kanungo
  • Lorenz von Seidlein
  • Rodney Carbis
  • Seung Hyun Han
  • Seong Hye Shin
  • Stephen Attridge
  • Raman Rao
  • Jan Holmgren
  • John Clemens
  • Sujit K Bhattacharya

Abstract

Objectives: An effective vaccine against cholera has been used for public health purposes in Vietnam since the 1990s. This vaccine was reformulated to meet WHO requirements. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the reformulated bivalent (Vibrio cholerae 01 and 0139) killed whole cell oral vaccine in a cholera endemic area in Kolkata, India. Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial Setting: The trial was conducted in the clinical trial ward of the Infectious Diseases Hospital in Kolkata, India Participants: The participants were 101 healthy adults (males and non-pregnant females) aged 18–40 years and 100 healthy children (males and non-pregnant females) aged 1–17 years. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either the bivalent killed whole cell oral cholera vaccine or placebo (killed oral Escherichia coli K12) Outcome Measures: For safety: proportion of subjects with adverse events during the duration of study participation. For immunogenicity: Proportion of subjects who had a ≥4-fold rise in serum vibriocidal antibody titers 14 days after the second dose of vaccine or placebo. Results: Adverse reactions were observed with similar frequency among vaccine and placebo recipients in both age groups. Among adults 4% of vaccine and 8% of placebo recipients and among children 4% of vaccine and 2% of placebo recipients had at least one adverse event within 28 days of the first dose of the vaccine. Following immunization, 53% of adult and 80% of children vaccinees showed a ≥4 fold rise in serum V. cholerae O1 vibriocidal antibody titers. A less pronounced response to V. cholerae O139 vibriocidal antibody titers post-immunization was noted among vaccinees. Conclusions: We found the vaccine to be safe and immunogenic in a cholera-endemic area in India. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00119197

Suggested Citation

  • Dilip Mahalanabis & Anna Lena Lopez & Dipika Sur & Jacqueline Deen & Byomkesh Manna & Suman Kanungo & Lorenz von Seidlein & Rodney Carbis & Seung Hyun Han & Seong Hye Shin & Stephen Attridge & Raman R, 2008. "A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Bivalent Killed, Whole-Cell, Oral Cholera Vaccine in Adults and Children in a Cholera Endemic Area in Kolkata, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002323
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002323&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.