IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0001465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and Immunogenicity of an AMA-1 Malaria Vaccine in Malian Adults: Results of a Phase 1 Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Mahamadou A Thera
  • Ogobara K Doumbo
  • Drissa Coulibaly
  • Dapa A Diallo
  • Abdoulaye K Kone
  • Ando B Guindo
  • Karim Traore
  • Alassane Dicko
  • Issaka Sagara
  • Mahamadou S Sissoko
  • Mounirou Baby
  • Mady Sissoko
  • Issa Diarra
  • Amadou Niangaly
  • Amagana Dolo
  • Modibo Daou
  • Sory I Diawara
  • D Gray Heppner
  • V Ann Stewart
  • Evelina Angov
  • Elke S Bergmann-Leitner
  • David E Lanar
  • Sheetij Dutta
  • Lorraine Soisson
  • Carter L Diggs
  • Amanda Leach
  • Alex Owusu
  • Marie-Claude Dubois
  • Joe Cohen
  • Jason N Nixon
  • Aric Gregson
  • Shannon L Takala
  • Kirsten E Lyke
  • Christopher V Plowe

Abstract

Background: The objective was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the AMA-1-based blood-stage malaria vaccine FMP2.1/AS02A in adults exposed to seasonal malaria. Methodology/Principal Findings: A phase 1 double blind randomized controlled dose escalation trial was conducted in Bandiagara, Mali, West Africa, a rural town with intense seasonal transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The malaria vaccine FMP2.1/AS02A is a recombinant protein (FMP2.1) based on apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) from the 3D7 clone of P. falciparum, adjuvanted with AS02A. The comparator vaccine was a cell-culture rabies virus vaccine (RabAvert). Sixty healthy, malaria-experienced adults aged 18–55 y were recruited into 2 cohorts and randomized to receive either a half dose or full dose of the malaria vaccine (FMP2.1 25 µg/AS02A 0.25 mL or FMP2.1 50 µg/AS02A 0.5 mL) or rabies vaccine given in 3 doses at 0, 1 and 2 mo, and were followed for 1 y. Solicited symptoms were assessed for 7 d and unsolicited symptoms for 30 d after each vaccination. Serious adverse events were assessed throughout the study. Titers of anti-AMA-1 antibodies were measured by ELISA and P. falciparum growth inhibition assays were performed on sera collected at pre- and post-vaccination time points. Transient local pain and swelling were common and more frequent in both malaria vaccine dosage groups than in the comparator group. Anti-AMA-1 antibodies increased significantly in both malaria vaccine groups, peaking at nearly 5-fold and more than 6-fold higher than baseline in the half-dose and full-dose groups, respectively. Conclusion/Significance: The FMP2.1/AS02A vaccine had a good safety profile, was well-tolerated, and was highly immunogenic in malaria-exposed adults. This malaria vaccine is being evaluated in Phase 1 and 2 trials in children at this site. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00308061

Suggested Citation

  • Mahamadou A Thera & Ogobara K Doumbo & Drissa Coulibaly & Dapa A Diallo & Abdoulaye K Kone & Ando B Guindo & Karim Traore & Alassane Dicko & Issaka Sagara & Mahamadou S Sissoko & Mounirou Baby & Mady , 2008. "Safety and Immunogenicity of an AMA-1 Malaria Vaccine in Malian Adults: Results of a Phase 1 Randomized Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0001465
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001465&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0001465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0001465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.