IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global prevalence and case fatality rate of Enterovirus D68 infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amary Fall
  • Sebastien Kenmoe
  • Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo
  • Donatien Serge Mbaga
  • Arnol Bowo-Ngandji
  • Joseph Rodrigue Foe-Essomba
  • Serges Tchatchouang
  • Marie Amougou Atsama
  • Jacqueline Félicité Yéngué
  • Raoul Kenfack-Momo
  • Alfloditte Flore Feudjio
  • Alex Durand Nka
  • Chris Andre Mbongue Mikangue
  • Jean Bosco Taya-Fokou
  • Jeannette Nina Magoudjou-Pekam
  • Efietngab Atembeh Noura
  • Cromwel Zemnou-Tepap
  • Dowbiss Meta-Djomsi
  • Martin Maïdadi-Foudi
  • Ginette Irma Kame-Ngasse
  • Inès Nyebe
  • Larissa Gertrude Djukouo
  • Landry Kengne Gounmadje
  • Dimitri Tchami Ngongang
  • Martin Gael Oyono
  • Cynthia Paola Demeni Emoh
  • Hervé Raoul Tazokong
  • Gadji Mahamat
  • Cyprien Kengne-Ndé
  • Serge Alain Sadeuh-Mba
  • Ndongo Dia
  • Giuseppina La Rosa
  • Lucy Ndip
  • Richard Njouom

Abstract

A substantial amount of epidemiological data has been reported on Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infections after the 2014 outbreak. Our goal was to map the case fatality rate (CFR) and prevalence of current and past EV-D68 infections. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42021229255) with published articles on EV-68 infections in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus up to January 2021. We determined prevalences using a model random effect. Of the 4,329 articles retrieved from the databases, 89 studies that met the inclusion criteria were from 39 different countries with apparently healthy individuals and patients with acute respiratory infections, acute flaccid myelitis and asthma-related diseases. The CFR estimate revealed occasional deaths (7/1353) related to EV-D68 infections in patients with severe acute respiratory infections. Analyses showed that the combined prevalence of current and past EV-D68 infections was 4% (95% CI = 3.1–5.0) and 66.3% (95% CI = 40.0–88.2), respectively. The highest prevalences were in hospital outbreaks, developed countries, children under 5, after 2014, and in patients with acute flaccid myelitis and asthma-related diseases. The present study shows sporadic deaths linked to severe respiratory EV-D68 infections. The study also highlights a low prevalence of current EV-D68 infections as opposed to the existence of EV-D68 antibodies in almost all participants of the included studies. These findings therefore highlight the need to implement and/or strengthen continuous surveillance of EV-D68 infections in hospitals and in the community for the anticipation of the response to future epidemics.Author summary: Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infections represent a global public health concern. EV-D68 are detected in apparently healthy subjects and patients with acute respiratory illnesses, acute flaccid myelitis, and asthma-related illnesses. Enterovirus D68 was first described in 1962 and exhibited sporadic circulation until August 2014 when outbreaks of EV-D68 infections were reported in the USA and Canada mainly in children with acute flaccid myelitis and severe acute respiratory disease. We systematically reviewed the literature on EV-D68 infections globally in the present study to determine the case fatality rate and prevalence of current and past infections. Our results show sporadic deaths in patients with severe acute respiratory EV-D68 infections. Our data also show a low prevalence of EV-D68 in current infections unlike the presence of EV-D68 antibodies (past infections) in almost all individuals of all ages. EV-D68 infections were more prevalent in hospital outbreaks, industrialized countries, children

Suggested Citation

  • Amary Fall & Sebastien Kenmoe & Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo & Donatien Serge Mbaga & Arnol Bowo-Ngandji & Joseph Rodrigue Foe-Essomba & Serges Tchatchouang & Marie Amougou Atsama & Jacqueline Félicité Y, 2022. "Global prevalence and case fatality rate of Enterovirus D68 infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010073
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010073
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010073&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.