IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0009653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposed framework for the development and qualitative evaluation of West Nile virus models and their application to local public health decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander C Keyel
  • Morgan E Gorris
  • Ilia Rochlin
  • Johnny A Uelmen
  • Luis F Chaves
  • Gabriel L Hamer
  • Imelda K Moise
  • Marta Shocket
  • A Marm Kilpatrick
  • Nicholas B DeFelice
  • Justin K Davis
  • Eliza Little
  • Patrick Irwin
  • Andrew J Tyre
  • Kelly Helm Smith
  • Chris L Fredregill
  • Oliver Elison Timm
  • Karen M Holcomb
  • Michael C Wimberly
  • Matthew J Ward
  • Christopher M Barker
  • Charlotte G Rhodes
  • Rebecca L Smith

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) is a globally distributed mosquito-borne virus of great public health concern. The number of WNV human cases and mosquito infection patterns vary in space and time. Many statistical models have been developed to understand and predict WNV geographic and temporal dynamics. However, these modeling efforts have been disjointed with little model comparison and inconsistent validation. In this paper, we describe a framework to unify and standardize WNV modeling efforts nationwide. WNV risk, detection, or warning models for this review were solicited from active research groups working in different regions of the United States. A total of 13 models were selected and described. The spatial and temporal scales of each model were compared to guide the timing and the locations for mosquito and virus surveillance, to support mosquito vector control decisions, and to assist in conducting public health outreach campaigns at multiple scales of decision-making. Our overarching goal is to bridge the existing gap between model development, which is usually conducted as an academic exercise, and practical model applications, which occur at state, tribal, local, or territorial public health and mosquito control agency levels. The proposed model assessment and comparison framework helps clarify the value of individual models for decision-making and identifies the appropriate temporal and spatial scope of each model. This qualitative evaluation clearly identifies gaps in linking models to applied decisions and sets the stage for a quantitative comparison of models. Specifically, whereas many coarse-grained models (county resolution or greater) have been developed, the greatest need is for fine-grained, short-term planning models (m–km, days–weeks) that remain scarce. We further recommend quantifying the value of information for each decision to identify decisions that would benefit most from model input.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander C Keyel & Morgan E Gorris & Ilia Rochlin & Johnny A Uelmen & Luis F Chaves & Gabriel L Hamer & Imelda K Moise & Marta Shocket & A Marm Kilpatrick & Nicholas B DeFelice & Justin K Davis & Eli, 2021. "A proposed framework for the development and qualitative evaluation of West Nile virus models and their application to local public health decision-making," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009653
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.