IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0001362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost of Antibiotic Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma Control in a Remote Area of South Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Jan H Kolaczinski
  • Emily Robinson
  • Timothy P Finn

Abstract

Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) of antibiotics is a key component of the so-called “SAFE” strategy for trachoma control, while MDA of anthelminthics provides the cornerstone for control of a number of other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Simultaneous delivery of two or more of these drugs, renowned as “integrated NTD control,” is being promoted to reduce costs and expand intervention coverage. A cost analysis was conducted alongside an MDA campaign in a remote trachoma endemic area, to inform budgeting for NTD control in South Sudan. Methods and Findings: A first round of antibiotic MDA was conducted in the highly trachoma endemic county of Mayom, Unity state, from June to August 2010. A core team of seven staff delivered the intervention, including recruitment and training of 44 supervisors and 542 community drug distributors. Using an ingredients approach, financial and economic costs were captured from the provider perspective in a detailed costing database. Overall, 123,760 individuals were treated for trachoma, resulting in an estimated treatment coverage of 94%. The economic cost per person treated was USD 1.53, excluding the cost of the antibiotic azithromycin. Ninety four per cent of the delivery costs were recurrent costs, with personnel and travel/transport costs taking up the largest share. Conclusions: In a remote setting and for the initial round, MDA of antibiotics was considerably more expensive than USD 0.5 per person treated, an estimate frequently quoted to advocate for integrated NTD control. Drug delivery costs in South Sudan are unlikely to decrease substantially during subsequent MDA rounds, as the major cost drivers were recurrent costs. MDA campaigns for delivery of one or more drugs in South Sudan should thus be budgeted at around USD 1.5 per person treated, at least until further costing data for delivery of other NTD drugs, singly or in combination, are available. Author Summary: Trachoma is one of a group of so-called “neglected tropical diseases” (NTDs) for which safe and effective treatments are available. The International Trachoma Initiative oversees donation of the antibiotic azithromycin to endemic countries. Delivery of this drug to communities affected by trachoma is the responsibility of national programmes and their implementing partners, and should be conducted as part of a comprehensive control strategy termed “SAFE,” which includes trichiasis surgery, health education and water/sanitation interventions. There are little data on how much the different components of a trachoma control programme cost and none from South Sudan. To inform budgeting to scale up control of trachoma, and of other NTDs whose control relies on large-scale mass drug administration (MDA), the present study set out to determine the cost per person treated when antibiotics were delivered through a vertical campaign that covered 94% of the target population in a remote trachoma endemic area of South Sudan. The average economic cost per person treated was USD 1.53, which included all inputs not paid for in cash except for the cost of the donated azithromycin and the opportunity cost of community members attending treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan H Kolaczinski & Emily Robinson & Timothy P Finn, 2011. "The Cost of Antibiotic Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma Control in a Remote Area of South Sudan," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-6, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001362
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001362&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Declan Butler, 2009. "Neglected disease boost," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7231), pages 772-773, February.
    2. David H Molyneux & Peter J Hotez & Alan Fenwick, 2005. "“Rapid-Impact Interventions”: How a Policy of Integrated Control for Africa's Neglected Tropical Diseases Could Benefit the Poor," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-1, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Olaniyi, 2020. "Socio-economic impacts of novel coronavirus: The policy solutions," BizEcons Quarterly, Strides Educational Foundation, vol. 7, pages 3-12.
    2. James Smith & Emma Michelle Taylor, 2013. "MDGs and NTDs: Reshaping the Global Health Agenda," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-3, December.
    3. Peter J Hotez & Bernard Pecoul, 2010. "“Manifesto” for Advancing the Control and Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-7, May.
    4. Thomas Fürst & Paola Salari & Laura Monzón Llamas & Peter Steinmann & Christopher Fitzpatrick & Fabrizio Tediosi, 2017. "Global health policy and neglected tropical diseases: Then, now, and in the years to come," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-5, September.
    5. Parker, Melissa & Allen, Tim, 2011. "Does mass drug administration for the integrated treatment of neglected tropical diseases really work?: assessing evidence for the control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths in Uganda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 44291, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Jan H Kolaczinski & Kara Hanson & Emily Robinson & Diana Picon & Anthony Sabasio & Martin Mpakateni & Mounir Lado & Stephen Moore & Nora Petty & Simon Brooker, 2010. "Integrated Surveys of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Southern Sudan: How Much Do They Cost and Can They Be Refined?," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-8, July.
    7. Caitlin Dunn & Kelly Callahan & Moses Katabarwa & Frank Richards & Donald Hopkins & P Craig Withers Jr. & Lucas E Buyon & Deborah McFarland, 2015. "The Contributions of Onchocerciasis Control and Elimination Programs toward the Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Peter J Hotez, 2015. "Blue Marble Health Redux: Neglected Tropical Diseases and Human Development in the Group of 20 (G20) Nations and Nigeria," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-5, July.
    9. Folahanmi T. Akinsolu & Priscilla O. Nemieboka & Diana W. Njuguna & Makafui N. Ahadji & Dora Dezso & Orsolya Varga, 2019. "Emerging Resistance of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Scoping Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Brajendra K Singh & Moses J Bockarie & Manoj Gambhir & Peter M Siba & Daniel J Tisch & James Kazura & Edwin Michael, 2013. "Sequential Modelling of the Effects of Mass Drug Treatments on Anopheline-Mediated Lymphatic Filariasis Infection in Papua New Guinea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Peter J Hotez, 2013. "NTDs V.2.0: “Blue Marble Health”—Neglected Tropical Disease Control and Elimination in a Shifting Health Policy Landscape," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.