IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1003944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National adaptation and implementation of WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth F Peacocke
  • Sonja L Myhre
  • Hakan Safaralilo Foss
  • Unni Gopinathan

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines (WHO EML) has played a critical role in guiding the country-level selection and financing of medicines for more than 4 decades. It continues to be a relevant evidence-based policy that can support universal health coverage (UHC) and access to essential medicines. The objective of this review was to identify factors affecting adaptation and implementation of WHO EML at the national level. Methods and findings: We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis by searching 10 databases (including CINAHL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) through October 2021. Primary qualitative studies focused on country-level implementation of WHO EML were included. The qualitative findings were populated in the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE) checklist, and key themes were identified through an iterative process. We appraised the papers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool and assessed our confidence in the findings using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual). We screened 1,567 unique citations, reviewed 183 full texts, and included 23 studies, from 30 settings. Non-English studies and experiences and perceptions of stakeholders published in gray literature were not collected. Conclusions: This qualitative evidence synthesis underscores the complexity and interdependencies inherent to implementation of WHO EML. To maximize the value of NMLs, greater investments should be made in processes and institutions that are needed to support various stages of the implementation pathway from global norms to adjusting prescribed behavior. Moreover, further research on linkages between NMLs, procurement, and the availability of medicines will provide additional insight into optimal NML implementation. Protocol registry: PROSPERO CRD42018104112 Elizabeth F Peacocke and colleagues review factors associated with adaptation and implementation of the WHO model list of essential medicines at the national level.Why was this study done: What did the researchers do and find: What do these findings mean:

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth F Peacocke & Sonja L Myhre & Hakan Safaralilo Foss & Unni Gopinathan, 2022. "National adaptation and implementation of WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: A qualitative evidence synthesis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003944
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003944&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.