IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1003788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR): Development of the SIFHR Checklist

Author

Listed:
  • Eneyi E Kpokiri
  • Elizabeth Chen
  • Jingjing Li
  • Sarah Payne
  • Priyanka Shrestha
  • Kaosar Afsana
  • Uche Amazigo
  • Phyllis Awor
  • Jean-Francois de Lavison
  • Saqif Khan
  • Jana Mier-Alpaño
  • Alberto Ong Jr
  • Shivani Subhedar
  • Isabelle Wachmuth
  • Luis Gabriel Cuervo
  • Kala M Mehta
  • Beatrice Halpaap
  • Joseph D Tucker

Abstract

Background: Social innovations in health are inclusive solutions to address the healthcare delivery gap that meet the needs of end users through a multi-stakeholder, community-engaged process. While social innovations in health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovation. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. Methods and findings: The research checklist was developed through a 3-step community-engaged process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a 3-round modified Delphi process. The call for entries solicited checklists and related items and was open between November 27, 2019 and February 1, 2020. In addition to the open call submissions and scoping review findings, a 17-item Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR) Checklist was developed based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist. The checklist was then refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys conducted between May and June 2020. The resulting checklist will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting, increase end-user engagement, and help assess social innovation projects. A limitation of the open call was requiring internet access, which likely discouraged participation of some subgroups. Conclusions: The SIFHR Checklist will strengthen the reporting of social innovation in health research studies. More research is needed on social innovation for health. Eneyi Kpokiri and co-workers describe development of a research checklist for reporting studies involving social innovations for health.

Suggested Citation

  • Eneyi E Kpokiri & Elizabeth Chen & Jingjing Li & Sarah Payne & Priyanka Shrestha & Kaosar Afsana & Uche Amazigo & Phyllis Awor & Jean-Francois de Lavison & Saqif Khan & Jana Mier-Alpaño & Alberto Ong , 2021. "Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR): Development of the SIFHR Checklist," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003788
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rivieccio, Giorgia & Raïes, Karine & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "Are you attractive enough? An empirical analysis on user innovators' characteristics and the creation of new social ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.