IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes towards and experiences with economic incentives for engagement in HIV care and treatment: Qualitative insights from a randomized trial in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Iguna
  • Monica Getahun
  • Jayne Lewis-Kulzer
  • Gladys Odhiambo
  • Fridah Adhiambo
  • Lina Montoya
  • Maya L Petersen
  • Elizabeth Bukusi
  • Thomas Odeny
  • Elvin Geng
  • Carol S Camlin

Abstract

Growing literature has shown heterogenous effects of conditional cash incentives (CCIs) on HIV care retention. The field lacks insights into reasons why incentives impact various patients in different ways–differences that may be due to variations in psychological and social mechanisms of effect. A deeper understanding of patients’ perceptions and experiences of CCIs for retention may help to clarify these mechanisms. We conducted a qualitative study embedded in the ADAPT-R trial (NCT#02338739), a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) that evaluated economic incentives to support retention in HIV care among persons living with HIV (PLHIV) initiating antiretroviral therapy in Kenya. Participants who attended their scheduled clinic visits received an incentive of approximately $4 each visit. Interviews were conducted between July 2016 and June 2017 with 39 participants to explore attitudes and experiences with economic incentives conditional on care engagement. Analyses revealed that incentives helped PLHIV prioritize care-seeking by alleviating transport barriers and food insecurity: “I decided to forgo [work] and attend clinic […] the voucher relieved me”. Patients who borrowed money for care-seeking reported feeling relieved from the burden of indebtedness to others: “I borrow with confidence that I will pay after my appointment.” Incentives fostered their autonomy, and enabled them to support others: “I used the money to buy some clothes and Pampers for the children.” Participants who were intrinsically motivated to engage in care (“my life depends on the drugs, not the incentive”), and those who mistrusted researchers, reported being less prompted by the incentive itself. For patients not already prioritizing care-seeking, incentives facilitated care engagement through alleviating transport costs, indebtedness and food insecurity, and also supported social role fulfillment. Conditional cash incentives may be an important cue to action to improve progression through the HIV treatment cascade, and contribute to better care retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Iguna & Monica Getahun & Jayne Lewis-Kulzer & Gladys Odhiambo & Fridah Adhiambo & Lina Montoya & Maya L Petersen & Elizabeth Bukusi & Thomas Odeny & Elvin Geng & Carol S Camlin, 2022. "Attitudes towards and experiences with economic incentives for engagement in HIV care and treatment: Qualitative insights from a randomized trial in Kenya," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000204
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000204&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.