IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MOSTWAS: Multi-Omic Strategies for Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Arjun Bhattacharya
  • Yun Li
  • Michael I Love

Abstract

Traditional predictive models for transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) consider only single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) local to genes of interest and perform parameter shrinkage with a regularization process. These approaches ignore the effect of distal-SNPs or other molecular effects underlying the SNP-gene association. Here, we outline multi-omics strategies for transcriptome imputation from germline genetics to allow more powerful testing of gene-trait associations by prioritizing distal-SNPs to the gene of interest. In one extension, we identify mediating biomarkers (CpG sites, microRNAs, and transcription factors) highly associated with gene expression and train predictive models for these mediators using their local SNPs. Imputed values for mediators are then incorporated into the final predictive model of gene expression, along with local SNPs. In the second extension, we assess distal-eQTLs (SNPs associated with genes not in a local window around it) for their mediation effect through mediating biomarkers local to these distal-eSNPs. Distal-eSNPs with large indirect mediation effects are then included in the transcriptomic prediction model with the local SNPs around the gene of interest. Using simulations and real data from ROS/MAP brain tissue and TCGA breast tumors, we show considerable gains of percent variance explained (1–2% additive increase) of gene expression and TWAS power to detect gene-trait associations. This integrative approach to transcriptome-wide imputation and association studies aids in identifying the complex interactions underlying genetic regulation within a tissue and important risk genes for various traits and disorders.Author summary: Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) are a powerful strategy to study gene-trait associations by integrating genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with gene expression datasets. TWAS increases study power and interpretability by mapping genetic variants to genes. However, traditional TWAS consider only variants that are close to a gene and thus ignores important variants far away from the gene that may be involved in complex regulatory mechanisms. Here, we present MOSTWAS (Multi-Omic Strategies for TWAS), a suite of tools that extends the TWAS framework to include these distal variants. MOSTWAS leverages multi-omic data of regulatory biomarkers (transcription factors, microRNAs, epigenetics) and borrows from techniques in mediation analysis to prioritize distal variants that are around these regulatory biomarkers. Using simulations and real public data from brain tissue and breast tumors, we show that MOSTWAS improves upon traditional TWAS in both predictive performance and power to detect gene-trait associations. MOSTWAS also aids in identifying possible mechanisms for gene regulation using a novel added-last test that assesses the added information gained from the distal variants beyond the local association. In conclusion, our method aids in detecting important risk genes for traits and disorders and the possible complex interactions underlying genetic regulation within a tissue.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjun Bhattacharya & Yun Li & Michael I Love, 2021. "MOSTWAS: Multi-Omic Strategies for Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009398
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009398
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009398&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qile Dai & Geyu Zhou & Hongyu Zhao & Urmo Võsa & Lude Franke & Alexis Battle & Alexander Teumer & Terho Lehtimäki & Olli T. Raitakari & Tõnu Esko & Michael P. Epstein & Jingjing Yang, 2023. "OTTERS: a powerful TWAS framework leveraging summary-level reference data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.