IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Boyer
  • Lucas Hérissant
  • Gavin Sherlock

Abstract

The environmental conditions of microorganisms’ habitats may fluctuate in unpredictable ways, such as changes in temperature, carbon source, pH, and salinity to name a few. Environmental heterogeneity presents a challenge to microorganisms, as they have to adapt not only to be fit under a specific condition, but they must also be robust across many conditions and be able to deal with the switch between conditions itself. While experimental evolution has been used to gain insight into the adaptive process, this has largely been in either unvarying or consistently varying conditions. In cases where changing environments have been investigated, relatively little is known about how such environments influence the dynamics of the adaptive process itself, as well as the genetic and phenotypic outcomes. We designed a systematic series of evolution experiments where we used two growth conditions that have differing timescales of adaptation and varied the rate of switching between them. We used lineage tracking to follow adaptation, and whole genome sequenced adaptive clones from each of the experiments. We find that both the switch rate and the order of the conditions influences adaptation. We also find different adaptive outcomes, at both the genetic and phenotypic levels, even when populations spent the same amount of total time in the two different conditions, but the order and/or switch rate differed. Thus, in a variable environment adaptation depends not only on the nature of the conditions and phenotypes under selection, but also on the complexity of the manner in which those conditions are combined to result in a given dynamic environment.Author summary: The environments in which organisms evolve typically fluctuate, in both predictable ways, such as daily, seasonal and annual changes in, for example, temperature and photoperiod, as well as in hard to predict ways, such as changes in the weather. Most laboratory evolution experiments evolve organisms in either constant environments, or environments that change predictably, such as by serial dilution into fresh media periodically. To investigate how unpredictable changes in the environment can affect an organism’s evolution, we designed a series of experiments where the environment alternated between two conditions, either predictably, or randomly, with different timescales of switching. We then evolved the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae under these different conditions. We found that the both the switch rate and the order of the conditions influences adaptation, and that switching can both speed up and slow down adaptation. We also observed different adaptive outcomes between populations, both at the genetic and phenotypic level, even if populations spent the same amount of total time in the two different conditions, but that the order and/or switch rate differed. These data suggest that adaptive outcomes are dependent on the exact nature of the prevailing environmental conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Boyer & Lucas Hérissant & Gavin Sherlock, 2021. "Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009314
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009314&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex N. Nguyen Ba & Ivana Cvijović & José I. Rojas Echenique & Katherine R. Lawrence & Artur Rego-Costa & Xianan Liu & Sasha F. Levy & Michael M. Desai, 2019. "High-resolution lineage tracking reveals travelling wave of adaptation in laboratory yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7783), pages 494-499, November.
    2. Amir Mitchell & Gal H. Romano & Bella Groisman & Avihu Yona & Erez Dekel & Martin Kupiec & Orna Dahan & Yitzhak Pilpel, 2009. "Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7252), pages 220-224, July.
    3. Gregory I. Lang & Daniel P. Rice & Mark J. Hickman & Erica Sodergren & George M. Weinstock & David Botstein & Michael M. Desai, 2013. "Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7464), pages 571-574, August.
    4. Sasha F. Levy & Jamie R. Blundell & Sandeep Venkataram & Dmitri A. Petrov & Daniel S. Fisher & Gavin Sherlock, 2015. "Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking," Nature, Nature, vol. 519(7542), pages 181-186, March.
    5. Hubertus J. E. Beaumont & Jenna Gallie & Christian Kost & Gayle C. Ferguson & Paul B. Rainey, 2009. "Experimental evolution of bet hedging," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7269), pages 90-93, November.
    6. Michael J. McDonald & Daniel P. Rice & Michael M. Desai, 2016. "Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7593), pages 233-236, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie Rescan & Daphné Grulois & Enrique Ortega Aboud & Pierre de Villemereuil & Luis-Miguel Chevin, 2021. "Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel P. G. H. Wong & Benjamin H. Good, 2024. "Quantifying the adaptive landscape of commensal gut bacteria using high-resolution lineage tracking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Marie Rescan & Daphné Grulois & Enrique Ortega Aboud & Pierre de Villemereuil & Luis-Miguel Chevin, 2021. "Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Andrew W. Lo & H. Allen Orr & Ruixun Zhang, 2018. "The growth of relative wealth and the Kelly criterion," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 49-67, April.
    4. Li Xie & Wenying Shou, 2021. "Steering ecological-evolutionary dynamics to improve artificial selection of microbial communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Serhii Aif & Nico Appold & Lucas Kampman & Oskar Hallatschek & Jona Kayser, 2022. "Evolutionary rescue of resistant mutants is governed by a balance between radial expansion and selection in compact populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    7. David A Sivak & Matt Thomson, 2014. "Environmental Statistics and Optimal Regulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Peña, Jorge & Nöldeke, Georg & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "Relatedness and synergies of kind and scale in the evolution of helping," Working papers 2014/09, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    9. Gary Friedman & Stephen McCarthy & Dmitrii Rachinskii, 2014. "Hysteresis Can Grant Fitness in Stochastically Varying Environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.
    10. Peter A. Corning, 2014. "Systems Theory and the Role of Synergy in the Evolution of Living Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 181-196, March.
    11. Andreas Wagner, 2023. "Evolvability-enhancing mutations in the fitness landscapes of an RNA and a protein," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Alief Moulana & Thomas Dupic & Angela M. Phillips & Jeffrey Chang & Serafina Nieves & Anne A. Roffler & Allison J. Greaney & Tyler N. Starr & Jesse D. Bloom & Michael M. Desai, 2022. "Compensatory epistasis maintains ACE2 affinity in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Jessica A Lee & Siavash Riazi & Shahla Nemati & Jannell V Bazurto & Andreas E Vasdekis & Benjamin J Ridenhour & Christopher H Remien & Christopher J Marx, 2019. "Microbial phenotypic heterogeneity in response to a metabolic toxin: Continuous, dynamically shifting distribution of formaldehyde tolerance in Methylobacterium extorquens populations," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-38, November.
    14. Gaofei Jiang & Yuling Zhang & Min Chen & Josep Ramoneda & Liangliang Han & Yu Shi & Rémi Peyraud & Yikui Wang & Xiaojun Shi & Xinping Chen & Wei Ding & Alexandre Jousset & Yasufumi Hikichi & Kouhei Oh, 2024. "Effects of plant tissue permeability on invasion and population bottlenecks of a phytopathogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Terence C. Burnham & Aimee Dunlap & David W. Stephens, 2015. "Experimental Evolution and Economics," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    16. Alexander Tschantz & Anil K Seth & Christopher L Buckley, 2020. "Learning action-oriented models through active inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, April.
    17. Byer, Nathan W. & Reid, Brendan N., 2022. "The emergence of imperfect philopatry and fidelity in spatially and temporally heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    18. Miller, Craig R. & Van Leuven, James T. & Wichman, Holly A. & Joyce, Paul, 2018. "Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: Additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 97-109.
    19. Andrea Fulgione & Célia Neto & Ahmed F. Elfarargi & Emmanuel Tergemina & Shifa Ansari & Mehmet Göktay & Herculano Dinis & Nina Döring & Pádraic J. Flood & Sofia Rodriguez-Pacheco & Nora Walden & Marcu, 2022. "Parallel reduction in flowering time from de novo mutations enable evolutionary rescue in colonizing lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Joao A. Ascensao & Kelly M. Wetmore & Benjamin H. Good & Adam P. Arkin & Oskar Hallatschek, 2023. "Quantifying the local adaptive landscape of a nascent bacterial community," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.