IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1008619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for long-range correlations in genome-wide simulations of large cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic Nelson
  • Jerome Kelleher
  • Aaron P Ragsdale
  • Claudia Moreau
  • Gil McVean
  • Simon Gravel

Abstract

Coalescent simulations are widely used to examine the effects of evolution and demographic history on the genetic makeup of populations. Thanks to recent progress in algorithms and data structures, simulators such as the widely-used msprime now provide genome-wide simulations for millions of individuals. However, this software relies on classic coalescent theory and its assumptions that sample sizes are small and that the region being simulated is short. Here we show that coalescent simulations of long regions of the genome exhibit large biases in identity-by-descent (IBD), long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD), and ancestry patterns, particularly when the sample size is large. We present a Wright-Fisher extension to msprime, and show that it produces more realistic distributions of IBD, LD, and ancestry proportions, while also addressing more subtle biases of the coalescent. Further, these extensions are more computationally efficient than state-of-the-art coalescent simulations when simulating long regions, including whole-genome data. For shorter regions, efficiency can be maintained via a hybrid model which simulates the recent past under the Wright-Fisher model and uses coalescent simulations in the distant past.Author summary: Coalescent theory has provided deep theoretical insight into patterns of human diversity. Implementations of coalescent models in simulation software such as ms have further provided tools to interpret thousands of genomic studies. Recent technical progress has allowed for a dramatic increase in the scale at which genomes can be both measured and simulated, opening up opportunities for a finer understanding of evolutionary biology. However, we show that coalescent simulations of long regions of the genome exhibit large biases in sample relatedness, distorting haplotype sharing and ancestry patterns in simulated cohorts. We trace these biases to basic assumptions of the coalescent model, and show how the assumptions can be relaxed to provide a better description of the observed patterns of genetic polymorphism at a fraction of the computational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic Nelson & Jerome Kelleher & Aaron P Ragsdale & Claudia Moreau & Gil McVean & Simon Gravel, 2020. "Accounting for long-range correlations in genome-wide simulations of large cohorts," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1008619
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008619&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1008619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.