IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective quantification of nerves in immunohistochemistry specimens of thyroid cancer utilising deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Indriani P Astono
  • James S Welsh
  • Christopher W Rowe
  • Phillip Jobling

Abstract

Accurate quantification of nerves in cancer specimens is important to understand cancer behaviour. Typically, nerves are manually detected and counted in digitised images of thin tissue sections from excised tumours using immunohistochemistry. However the images are of a large size with nerves having substantial variation in morphology that renders accurate and objective quantification difficult using existing manual and automated counting techniques. Manual counting is precise, but time-consuming, susceptible to inconsistency and has a high rate of false negatives. Existing automated techniques using digitised tissue sections and colour filters are sensitive, however, have a high rate of false positives. In this paper we develop a new automated nerve detection approach, based on a deep learning model with an augmented classification structure. This approach involves pre-processing to extract the image patches for the deep learning model, followed by pixel-level nerve detection utilising the proposed deep learning model. Outcomes assessed were a) sensitivity of the model in detecting manually identified nerves (expert annotations), and b) the precision of additional model-detected nerves. The proposed deep learning model based approach results in a sensitivity of 89% and a precision of 75%. The code and pre-trained model are publicly available at https://github.com/IA92/Automated_Nerves_Quantification.Author summary: The study of nerves as a prognostic marker for cancer is becoming increasingly important. However, accurate quantification of nerves in cancer specimens is difficult to achieve due to limitations in the existing manual and automated quantification methods. Manual quantification is time-consuming and subject to bias, whilst automated quantification, in general, has a high rate of false detections that makes it somewhat unreliable. In this paper, we propose an automated nerve quantification approach based on a novel deep learning model structure for objective nerve quantification in immunohistochemistry specimens of thyroid cancer. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach by comparing it with existing manual and automated quantification methods. We show that our proposed approach is superior to the existing manual and automated quantification methods. The proposed approach is shown to have a high precision as well as being able to detect a significant number of nerves not detected by the experts in manual counting.

Suggested Citation

  • Indriani P Astono & James S Welsh & Christopher W Rowe & Phillip Jobling, 2022. "Objective quantification of nerves in immunohistochemistry specimens of thyroid cancer utilising deep learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009912
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009912
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009912&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.