IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic wound detection and size estimation using deep learning algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Héctor Carrión
  • Mohammad Jafari
  • Michelle Dawn Bagood
  • Hsin-ya Yang
  • Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff
  • Marcella Gomez

Abstract

Evaluating and tracking wound size is a fundamental metric for the wound assessment process. Good location and size estimates can enable proper diagnosis and effective treatment. Traditionally, laboratory wound healing studies include a collection of images at uniform time intervals exhibiting the wounded area and the healing process in the test animal, often a mouse. These images are then manually observed to determine key metrics —such as wound size progress— relevant to the study. However, this task is a time-consuming and laborious process. In addition, defining the wound edge could be subjective and can vary from one individual to another even among experts. Furthermore, as our understanding of the healing process grows, so does our need to efficiently and accurately track these key factors for high throughput (e.g., over large-scale and long-term experiments). Thus, in this study, we develop a deep learning-based image analysis pipeline that aims to intake non-uniform wound images and extract relevant information such as the location of interest, wound only image crops, and wound periphery size over-time metrics. In particular, our work focuses on images of wounded laboratory mice that are used widely for translationally relevant wound studies and leverages a commonly used ring-shaped splint present in most images to predict wound size. We apply the method to a dataset that was never meant to be quantified and, thus, presents many visual challenges. Additionally, the data set was not meant for training deep learning models and so is relatively small in size with only 256 images. We compare results to that of expert measurements and demonstrate preservation of information relevant to predicting wound closure despite variability from machine-to-expert and even expert-to-expert. The proposed system resulted in high fidelity results on unseen data with minimal human intervention. Furthermore, the pipeline estimates acceptable wound sizes when less than 50% of the images are missing reference objects.Author summary: Knowledge of the wound size changes over-time allows us to observe important insights such as rate of closure, time to closure, and expansion events, which are key indicators for predicting healing status. To better perform wound measurements it is essential to utilize a technique that returns accurate and consistent results every time. Over the last years, collecting wound images is becoming easier and more popular as digital cameras and smartphones are more accessible. Commonly, scientists/clinicians trace the wound in these images manually to observe changes in the wound, which is normally a slow and labor-intensive process and also requires a trained eye. The clinical goal is to more efficiently and effectively treat wounds by employing easy to use and precise wound measurement techniques. Therefore, the objective should be devising automatic and precise wound measurement tools to be used for wound assessment. To this end, we leveraged a combination of various state-of-the-art computer vision and machine learning-based methods for developing a versatile and automatic wound assessment tool. We applied this tool to analyze the images of wound inflicted lab mice and showed that our developed tool automated the overall wound measurement process, therefore, resulting in high fidelity results without significant human intervention. Furthermore, we compared results to two expert measurements. We found variability in measurement even across experts further validating the need for a consistent approach. However, qualitative behavior, which is most important for predicting wound closure, is preserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Héctor Carrión & Mohammad Jafari & Michelle Dawn Bagood & Hsin-ya Yang & Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff & Marcella Gomez, 2022. "Automatic wound detection and size estimation using deep learning algorithms," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009852
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009852
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009852&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.