IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protein—protein binding supersites

Author

Listed:
  • Raji Viswanathan
  • Eduardo Fajardo
  • Gabriel Steinberg
  • Matthew Haller
  • Andras Fiser

Abstract

The lack of a deep understanding of how proteins interact remains an important roadblock in advancing efforts to identify binding partners and uncover the corresponding regulatory mechanisms of the functions they mediate. Understanding protein-protein interactions is also essential for designing specific chemical modifications to develop new reagents and therapeutics. We explored the hypothesis of whether protein interaction sites serve as generic biding sites for non-cognate protein ligands, just as it has been observed for small-molecule-binding sites in the past. Using extensive computational docking experiments on a test set of 241 protein complexes, we found that indeed there is a strong preference for non-cognate ligands to bind to the cognate binding site of a receptor. This observation appears to be robust to variations in docking programs, types of non-cognate protein probes, sizes of binding patches, relative sizes of binding patches and full-length proteins, and the exploration of obligate and non-obligate complexes. The accuracy of the docking scoring function appears to play a role in defining the correct site. The frequency of interaction of unrelated probes recognizing the binding interface was utilized in a simple prediction algorithm that showed accuracy competitive with other state of the art methods.Author summary: Protein–protein interactions are key to understand the molecular level mechanisms of regulation in the cell. However, there is still a limited understanding of what distinguishes a protein-protein binding site from the rest of the surface. This lack of knowledge is manifested in the relatively low accuracy of computational methods that try to predict protein interfaces. In this work we report a new conceptual insight about protein interfaces. Our results suggest that protein interfaces serve as generic binding sites to any ligand. This also means that in the absence of the known binding partner it is still possible to define protein interfaces by extensive docking studies of randomly selected, unrelated ligands, as they have a strong tendency to bind to the cognate binding site. This insight was leveraged in a new binding interface prediction algorithm that alone outperforms state of the art approaches that often combine a variety of features.

Suggested Citation

  • Raji Viswanathan & Eduardo Fajardo & Gabriel Steinberg & Matthew Haller & Andras Fiser, 2019. "Protein—protein binding supersites," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006704
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian G Pierce & Yuichiro Hourai & Zhiping Weng, 2011. "Accelerating Protein Docking in ZDOCK Using an Advanced 3D Convolution Library," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-6, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saurabh Gupta & Atmakuri Ramakrishna Rao & Pritish Kumar Varadwaj & Sachinandan De & Trilochan Mohapatra, 2015. "Extrapolation of Inter Domain Communications and Substrate Binding Cavity of Camel HSP70 1A: A Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Nobuyuki Uchikoga & Yuri Matsuzaki & Masahito Ohue & Takatsugu Hirokawa & Yutaka Akiyama, 2013. "Re-Docking Scheme for Generating Near-Native Protein Complexes by Assembling Residue Interaction Fingerprints," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Xia Wang & Jiayu Wang & Yashuang Chen & Xiaojing Qian & Shiqi Luo & Xue Wang & Chao Ma & Wei Ge, 2024. "The aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 rs671 variant enhances amyloid β pathology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.