IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Ebsch
  • Robert Rosenbaum

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between external stimuli and the spiking activity of cortical populations is a central problem in neuroscience. Dense recurrent connectivity in local cortical circuits can lead to counterintuitive response properties, raising the question of whether there are simple arithmetical rules for relating circuits’ connectivity structure to their response properties. One such arithmetic is provided by the mean field theory of balanced networks, which is derived in a limit where excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents precisely balance on average. However, balanced network theory is not applicable to some biologically relevant connectivity structures. We show that cortical circuits with such structure are susceptible to an amplification mechanism arising when excitatory-inhibitory balance is broken at the level of local subpopulations, but maintained at a global level. This amplification, which can be quantified by a linear correction to the classical mean field theory of balanced networks, explains several response properties observed in cortical recordings and provides fundamental insights into the relationship between connectivity structure and neural responses in cortical circuits.Author summary: Understanding how the brain represents and processes stimuli requires a quantitative understanding of how signals propagate through networks of neurons. Developing such an understanding is made difficult by the dense interconnectivity of neurons, especially in the cerebral cortex. One approach to quantifying neural processing in the cortex is derived from observations that excitatory (positive) and inhibitory (negative) interactions between neurons tend to balance each other in many brain areas. This balance is achieved under a class of computational models called “balanced networks.” However, previous approaches to the mathematical analysis of balanced network models is not possible under some biologically relevant connectivity structures. We show that, under these structures, balance between excitation and inhibition is necessarily broken and the resulting imbalance causes some stimulus features to be amplified. This “imbalanced amplification” of stimuli can explain several observations from recordings in mouse somatosensory and visual cortical circuits and provides fundamental insights into the relationship between connectivity structure and neural responses in cortical circuits.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Ebsch & Robert Rosenbaum, 2018. "Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006048
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006048&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hillel Adesnik & Massimo Scanziani, 2010. "Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7292), pages 1155-1160, April.
    2. Andrew Y. Y. Tan & Yuzhi Chen & Benjamin Scholl & Eyal Seidemann & Nicholas J. Priebe, 2014. "Sensory stimulation shifts visual cortex from synchronous to asynchronous states," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7499), pages 226-229, May.
    3. Hillel Adesnik & William Bruns & Hiroki Taniguchi & Z. Josh Huang & Massimo Scanziani, 2012. "A neural circuit for spatial summation in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 490(7419), pages 226-231, October.
    4. Klaus Wimmer & Albert Compte & Alex Roxin & Diogo Peixoto & Alfonso Renart & Jaime de la Rocha, 2015. "Sensory integration dynamics in a hierarchical network explains choice probabilities in cortical area MT," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Ho Ko & Sonja B. Hofer & Bruno Pichler & Katherine A. Buchanan & P. Jesper Sjöström & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2011. "Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7345), pages 87-91, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takafumi Arakaki & G Barello & Yashar Ahmadian, 2019. "Inferring neural circuit structure from datasets of heterogeneous tuning curves," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, April.
    2. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Bettina Voelcker & Ravi Pancholi & Simon Peron, 2022. "Transformation of primary sensory cortical representations from layer 4 to layer 2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan & Alexandre Pouget & Gregory C DeAngelis & Dora E Angelaki & Xaq Pitkow, 2018. "Inferring decoding strategies for multiple correlated neural populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-40, September.
    5. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Andrew M. Clark & David C. Bradley, 2022. "A neural correlate of perceptual segmentation in macaque middle temporal cortical area," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Thomas Miconi & Rufin VanRullen, 2016. "A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Manoj Kumar & Gregory Handy & Stylianos Kouvaros & Yanjun Zhao & Lovisa Ljungqvist Brinson & Eric Wei & Brandon Bizup & Brent Doiron & Thanos Tzounopoulos, 2023. "Cell-type-specific plasticity of inhibitory interneurons in the rehabilitation of auditory cortex after peripheral damage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Iris Reuveni & Sourav Ghosh & Edi Barkai, 2017. "Real Time Multiplicative Memory Amplification Mediated by Whole-Cell Scaling of Synaptic Response in Key Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.
    10. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    11. Thaddeus R Cybulski & Edward S Boyden & George M Church & Keith E J Tyo & Konrad P Kording, 2017. "Nucleotide-time alignment for molecular recorders," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Suchin S Gururangan & Alexander J Sadovsky & Jason N MacLean, 2014. "Analysis of Graph Invariants in Functional Neocortical Circuitry Reveals Generalized Features Common to Three Areas of Sensory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    13. Jack Phu & Michael Kalloniatis & Sieu K Khuu, 2016. "The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Skander Mensi & Olivier Hagens & Wulfram Gerstner & Christian Pozzorini, 2016. "Enhanced Sensitivity to Rapid Input Fluctuations by Nonlinear Threshold Dynamics in Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, February.
    16. Markus Helmer & Vladislav Kozyrev & Valeska Stephan & Stefan Treue & Theo Geisel & Demian Battaglia, 2016. "Model-Free Estimation of Tuning Curves and Their Attentional Modulation, Based on Sparse and Noisy Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, January.
    17. Jeyadarshan Jeyabalaratnam & Vishal Bharmauria & Lyes Bachatene & Sarah Cattan & Annie Angers & Stéphane Molotchnikoff, 2013. "Adaptation Shifts Preferred Orientation of Tuning Curve in the Mouse Visual Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    18. Richard D Lange & Ankani Chattoraj & Jeffrey M Beck & Jacob L Yates & Ralf M Haefner, 2021. "A confirmation bias in perceptual decision-making due to hierarchical approximate inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Liu, Zhilong & Zhou, Ping & Ma, Jun & Hobiny, Aatef & Alzahrani, Faris, 2020. "Autonomic learning via saturation gain method, and synchronization between neurons," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Pierre Yger & Kenneth D Harris, 2013. "The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.