IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method to Constrain Genome-Scale Models with 13C Labeling Data

Author

Listed:
  • Héctor García Martín
  • Vinay Satish Kumar
  • Daniel Weaver
  • Amit Ghosh
  • Victor Chubukov
  • Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
  • Adam Arkin
  • Jay D Keasling

Abstract

Current limitations in quantitatively predicting biological behavior hinder our efforts to engineer biological systems to produce biofuels and other desired chemicals. Here, we present a new method for calculating metabolic fluxes, key targets in metabolic engineering, that incorporates data from 13C labeling experiments and genome-scale models. The data from 13C labeling experiments provide strong flux constraints that eliminate the need to assume an evolutionary optimization principle such as the growth rate optimization assumption used in Flux Balance Analysis (FBA). This effective constraining is achieved by making the simple but biologically relevant assumption that flux flows from core to peripheral metabolism and does not flow back. The new method is significantly more robust than FBA with respect to errors in genome-scale model reconstruction. Furthermore, it can provide a comprehensive picture of metabolite balancing and predictions for unmeasured extracellular fluxes as constrained by 13C labeling data. A comparison shows that the results of this new method are similar to those found through 13C Metabolic Flux Analysis (13C MFA) for central carbon metabolism but, additionally, it provides flux estimates for peripheral metabolism. The extra validation gained by matching 48 relative labeling measurements is used to identify where and why several existing COnstraint Based Reconstruction and Analysis (COBRA) flux prediction algorithms fail. We demonstrate how to use this knowledge to refine these methods and improve their predictive capabilities. This method provides a reliable base upon which to improve the design of biological systems.Author Summary: While metabolic fluxes constitute the most direct window into a cell’s metabolism, their accurate measurement is non trivial. The gold standard for flux measurement involves providing a labeled feed where some of the carbon atoms have been substituted by isotopes with higher atomic mass (13C instead of 12C). The ensuing labeling found in intracellular metabolites is then used to computationally infer the metabolic fluxes that produced the observed pattern. However, this procedure is typically performed with small metabolic models encompassing only central carbon metabolism. The genomic revolution has afforded us easily available genomes and, with them, comprehensive genome-scale models of cellular metabolism. It would be desirable to use the 13C labeling experimental data to constrain genome-scale models: these data constrain fluxes very effectively and provide in the labeling data fit an obvious proof that the underlying model correctly explains measured quantities. Here, we introduce a rigorous, self-consistent method that uses the full amount of information contained in 13C labeling data to constrain fluxes for a genome-scale model where underlying assumptions are explicitly stated.

Suggested Citation

  • Héctor García Martín & Vinay Satish Kumar & Daniel Weaver & Amit Ghosh & Victor Chubukov & Aindrila Mukhopadhyay & Adam Arkin & Jay D Keasling, 2015. "A Method to Constrain Genome-Scale Models with 13C Labeling Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-34, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004363
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004363&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroaki Kitano, 2002. "Computational systems biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 206-210, November.
    2. Christian Frezza & Liang Zheng & Ori Folger & Kartik N. Rajagopalan & Elaine D. MacKenzie & Livnat Jerby & Massimo Micaroni & Barbara Chaneton & Julie Adam & Ann Hedley & Gabriela Kalna & Ian P. M. To, 2011. "Haem oxygenase is synthetically lethal with the tumour suppressor fumarate hydratase," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7363), pages 225-228, September.
    3. Sang-Min Jeon & Navdeep S. Chandel & Nissim Hay, 2012. "AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis to promote tumour cell survival during energy stress," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7400), pages 661-665, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Bandara & Johannes P Schlöder & Roland Eils & Hans Georg Bock & Tobias Meyer, 2009. "Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Mark Read & Paul S. Andrews & Jon Timmis & Vipin Kumar, 2011. "Techniques for grounding agent-based simulations in the real domain: a case study in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 67-86, May.
    3. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    4. Jacobo Ayensa-Jiménez & Marina Pérez-Aliacar & Teodora Randelovic & José Antonio Sanz-Herrera & Mohamed H. Doweidar & Manuel Doblaré, 2020. "Analysis of the Parametric Correlation in Mathematical Modeling of In Vitro Glioblastoma Evolution Using Copulas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Qing-Ju Jiao & Yan-Kai Zhang & Lu-Ning Li & Hong-Bin Shen, 2011. "BinTree Seeking: A Novel Approach to Mine Both Bi-Sparse and Cohesive Modules in Protein Interaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Tom C Freeman & Leon Goldovsky & Markus Brosch & Stijn van Dongen & Pierre Mazière & Russell J Grocock & Shiri Freilich & Janet Thornton & Anton J Enright, 2007. "Construction, Visualisation, and Clustering of Transcription Networks from Microarray Expression Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Yuksel Bayraktar & Esme Isik & Ibrahim Isik & Ayfer Ozyilmaz & Metin Toprak & Fatma Kahraman Guloglu & Serdar Aydin, 2022. "Analyzing of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Biomedical and Socio-Economic Approach Using Molecular Communication, Artificial Neural Network, and Random Forest Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. André Schultz & Amina A Qutub, 2016. "Reconstruction of Tissue-Specific Metabolic Networks Using CORDA," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, March.
    9. Mika Gustafsson & Michael Hörnquist, 2010. "Gene Expression Prediction by Soft Integration and the Elastic Net—Best Performance of the DREAM3 Gene Expression Challenge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, February.
    10. Diego Fernández Slezak & Cecilia Suárez & Guillermo A Cecchi & Guillermo Marshall & Gustavo Stolovitzky, 2010. "When the Optimal Is Not the Best: Parameter Estimation in Complex Biological Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Matthew A Hibbs & Chad L Myers & Curtis Huttenhower & David C Hess & Kai Li & Amy A Caudy & Olga G Troyanskaya, 2009. "Directing Experimental Biology: A Case Study in Mitochondrial Biogenesis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Alan A Cohen & Emmanuel Milot & Qing Li & Patrick Bergeron & Roxane Poirier & Francis Dusseault-Bélanger & Tamàs Fülöp & Maxime Leroux & Véronique Legault & E Jeffrey Metter & Linda P Fried & Luigi Fe, 2015. "Detection of a Novel, Integrative Aging Process Suggests Complex Physiological Integration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Niki Vermeulen, 2018. "The choreography of a new research field: Aggregation, circulation and oscillation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(8), pages 1764-1784, November.
    14. Armaghan W Naik & Joshua D Kangas & Christopher J Langmead & Robert F Murphy, 2013. "Efficient Modeling and Active Learning Discovery of Biological Responses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    15. Joep P J Schmitz & Jeroen A L Jeneson & Joep W M van Oorschot & Jeanine J Prompers & Klaas Nicolay & Peter A J Hilbers & Natal A W van Riel, 2012. "Prediction of Muscle Energy States at Low Metabolic Rates Requires Feedback Control of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Activity by Inorganic Phosphate," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Jayaraman, K. & Paramasivan, Lavinsaa & Kiumarsi, Shaian, 2017. "Reasons for low penetration on the purchase of photovoltaic (PV) panel system among Malaysian landed property owners," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 562-571.
    17. Marco S Nobile & Paolo Cazzaniga & Daniela Besozzi & Dario Pescini & Giancarlo Mauri, 2014. "cuTauLeaping: A GPU-Powered Tau-Leaping Stochastic Simulator for Massive Parallel Analyses of Biological Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Fabian Fröhlich & Barbara Kaltenbacher & Fabian J Theis & Jan Hasenauer, 2017. "Scalable Parameter Estimation for Genome-Scale Biochemical Reaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Markus J. Buehler & Theodor Ackbarow, 2008. "Nanomechanical strength mechanisms of hierarchical biological materials and tissues," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 595-607.
    20. Luca Marchetti & Rosario Lombardo & Corrado Priami, 2017. "HSimulator: Hybrid Stochastic/Deterministic Simulation of Biochemical Reaction Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.