IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passive Dendrites Enable Single Neurons to Compute Linearly Non-separable Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Romain Daniel Cazé
  • Mark Humphries
  • Boris Gutkin

Abstract

Local supra-linear summation of excitatory inputs occurring in pyramidal cell dendrites, the so-called dendritic spikes, results in independent spiking dendritic sub-units, which turn pyramidal neurons into two-layer neural networks capable of computing linearly non-separable functions, such as the exclusive OR. Other neuron classes, such as interneurons, may possess only a few independent dendritic sub-units, or only passive dendrites where input summation is purely sub-linear, and where dendritic sub-units are only saturating. To determine if such neurons can also compute linearly non-separable functions, we enumerate, for a given parameter range, the Boolean functions implementable by a binary neuron model with a linear sub-unit and either a single spiking or a saturating dendritic sub-unit. We then analytically generalize these numerical results to an arbitrary number of non-linear sub-units. First, we show that a single non-linear dendritic sub-unit, in addition to the somatic non-linearity, is sufficient to compute linearly non-separable functions. Second, we analytically prove that, with a sufficient number of saturating dendritic sub-units, a neuron can compute all functions computable with purely excitatory inputs. Third, we show that these linearly non-separable functions can be implemented with at least two strategies: one where a dendritic sub-unit is sufficient to trigger a somatic spike; another where somatic spiking requires the cooperation of multiple dendritic sub-units. We formally prove that implementing the latter architecture is possible with both types of dendritic sub-units whereas the former is only possible with spiking dendrites. Finally, we show how linearly non-separable functions can be computed by a generic two-compartment biophysical model and a realistic neuron model of the cerebellar stellate cell interneuron. Taken together our results demonstrate that passive dendrites are sufficient to enable neurons to compute linearly non-separable functions. Author Summary: Classical views on single neuron computation treat dendrites as mere collectors of inputs, that is forwarded to the soma for linear summation and causes a spike output if it is sufficiently large. Such a single neuron model can only compute linearly separable input-output functions, representing a small fraction of all possible functions. Recent experimental findings show that in certain pyramidal cells excitatory inputs can be supra-linearly integrated within a dendritic branch, turning this branch into a spiking dendritic sub-unit. Neurons containing many of these dendritic sub-units can compute both linearly separable and linearly non-separable functions. Nevertheless, other neuron types have dendrites which do not spike because the required voltage gated channels are absent. However, these dendrites sub-linearly sum excitatory inputs turning branches into saturating sub-units. We wanted to test if this last type of non-linear summation is sufficient for a single neuron to compute linearly non-separable functions. Using a combination of Boolean algebra and biophysical modeling, we show that a neuron with a single non-linear dendritic sub-unit whether spiking or saturating is able to compute linearly non-separable functions. Thus, in principle, any neuron with a dendritic tree, even passive, can compute linearly non-separable functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Romain Daniel Cazé & Mark Humphries & Boris Gutkin, 2013. "Passive Dendrites Enable Single Neurons to Compute Linearly Non-separable Functions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002867
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002867&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balázs Ujfalussy & Tamás Kiss & Péter Érdi, 2009. "Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Hongbo Jia & Nathalie L. Rochefort & Xiaowei Chen & Arthur Konnerth, 2010. "Dendritic organization of sensory input to cortical neurons in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7293), pages 1307-1312, April.
    3. Jackie Schiller & Guy Major & Helmut J. Koester & Yitzhak Schiller, 2000. "NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6775), pages 285-289, March.
    4. Hagai Agmon-Snir & Catherine E. Carr & John Rinzel, 1998. "The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6682), pages 268-272, May.
    5. Karel Svoboda & Winfried Denk & David Kleinfeld & David W. Tank, 1997. "In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in neocortical pyramidal neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 385(6612), pages 161-165, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Balázs Ujfalussy & Tamás Kiss & Péter Érdi, 2009. "Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Zhiwei Xu & Erez Geron & Luis M. Pérez-Cuesta & Yang Bai & Wen-Biao Gan, 2023. "Generalized extinction of fear memory depends on co-allocation of synaptic plasticity in dendrites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Trygve Solstad & Hosam N Yousif & Terrence J Sejnowski, 2014. "Place Cell Rate Remapping by CA3 Recurrent Collaterals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    5. David M Santucci & Sridhar Raghavachari, 2008. "The Effects of NR2 Subunit-Dependent NMDA Receptor Kinetics on Synaptic Transmission and CaMKII Activation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Timm Lochmann & Timothy J Blanche & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Construction of Direction Selectivity through Local Energy Computations in Primary Visual Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Yang Yiling & Katharine Shapcott & Alina Peter & Johanna Klon-Lipok & Huang Xuhui & Andreea Lazar & Wolf Singer, 2023. "Robust encoding of natural stimuli by neuronal response sequences in monkey visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Michalis Pagkalos & Spyridon Chavlis & Panayiota Poirazi, 2023. "Introducing the Dendrify framework for incorporating dendrites to spiking neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Xiliang Zhang & Sichen Tao & Zheng Tang & Shuxin Zheng & Yoki Todo, 2023. "The Mechanism of Orientation Detection Based on Artificial Visual System for Greyscale Images," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Jeyadarshan Jeyabalaratnam & Vishal Bharmauria & Lyes Bachatene & Sarah Cattan & Annie Angers & Stéphane Molotchnikoff, 2013. "Adaptation Shifts Preferred Orientation of Tuning Curve in the Mouse Visual Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    11. Etay Hay & Sean Hill & Felix Schürmann & Henry Markram & Idan Segev, 2011. "Models of Neocortical Layer 5b Pyramidal Cells Capturing a Wide Range of Dendritic and Perisomatic Active Properties," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Yuting Li & Zongyue Cheng & Chenmao Wang & Jianian Lin & Hehai Jiang & Meng Cui, 2024. "Geometric transformation adaptive optics (GTAO) for volumetric deep brain imaging through gradient-index lenses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Kirsten Bohmbach & Nicola Masala & Eva M. Schönhense & Katharina Hill & André N. Haubrich & Andreas Zimmer & Thoralf Opitz & Heinz Beck & Christian Henneberger, 2022. "An astrocytic signaling loop for frequency-dependent control of dendritic integration and spatial learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Linda Judák & Balázs Chiovini & Gábor Juhász & Dénes Pálfi & Zsolt Mezriczky & Zoltán Szadai & Gergely Katona & Benedek Szmola & Katalin Ócsai & Bernadett Martinecz & Anna Mihály & Ádám Dénes & Bálint, 2022. "Sharp-wave ripple doublets induce complex dendritic spikes in parvalbumin interneurons in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Wei Chen & Ryan G. Natan & Yuhan Yang & Shih-Wei Chou & Qinrong Zhang & Ehud Y. Isacoff & Na Ji, 2021. "In vivo volumetric imaging of calcium and glutamate activity at synapses with high spatiotemporal resolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Sadra Sadeh & Stefan Rotter, 2015. "Orientation Selectivity in Inhibition-Dominated Networks of Spiking Neurons: Effect of Single Neuron Properties and Network Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.