IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural activity during a simple reaching task in macaques is counter to gating and rebound in basal ganglia–thalamic communication

Author

Listed:
  • Bettina C Schwab
  • Daisuke Kase
  • Andrew Zimnik
  • Robert Rosenbaum
  • Marcello G Codianni
  • Jonathan E Rubin
  • Robert S Turner

Abstract

Task-related activity in the ventral thalamus, a major target of basal ganglia output, is often assumed to be permitted or triggered by changes in basal ganglia activity through gating- or rebound-like mechanisms. To test those hypotheses, we sampled single-unit activity from connected basal ganglia output and thalamic nuclei (globus pallidus-internus [GPi] and ventrolateral anterior nucleus [VLa]) in monkeys performing a reaching task. Rate increases were the most common peri-movement change in both nuclei. Moreover, peri-movement changes generally began earlier in VLa than in GPi. Simultaneously recorded GPi-VLa pairs rarely showed short-time-scale spike-to-spike correlations or slow across-trials covariations, and both were equally positive and negative. Finally, spontaneous GPi bursts and pauses were both followed by small, slow reductions in VLa rate. These results appear incompatible with standard gating and rebound models. Still, gating or rebound may be possible in other physiological situations: simulations show how GPi-VLa communication can scale with GPi synchrony and GPi-to-VLa convergence, illuminating how synchrony of basal ganglia output during motor learning or in pathological conditions may render this pathway effective. Thus, in the healthy state, basal ganglia-thalamic communication during learned movement is more subtle than expected, with changes in firing rates possibly being dominated by a common external source.Task-related activity in the ventral thalamus, a major target of basal ganglia output, is often assumed to be permitted or triggered by changes in basal ganglia activity through gating- or rebound-like mechanisms. Paired unit recordings from connected regions of basal ganglia and thalamus in nonhuman primates reveal the absence of strong gating or rebound during a trained reaching task; simulations suggest the need for basal ganglia synchrony to effectively inhibit thalamus.

Suggested Citation

  • Bettina C Schwab & Daisuke Kase & Andrew Zimnik & Robert Rosenbaum & Marcello G Codianni & Jonathan E Rubin & Robert S Turner, 2020. "Neural activity during a simple reaching task in macaques is counter to gating and rebound in basal ganglia–thalamic communication," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-38, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000829
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000829
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000829&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zengcai V. Guo & Hidehiko K. Inagaki & Kayvon Daie & Shaul Druckmann & Charles R. Gerfen & Karel Svoboda, 2017. "Maintenance of persistent activity in a frontal thalamocortical loop," Nature, Nature, vol. 545(7653), pages 181-186, May.
    2. Eric A. Yttri & Joshua T. Dudman, 2016. "Opponent and bidirectional control of movement velocity in the basal ganglia," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 402-406, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin J. Griffiths & Tino Zaehle & Stefan Repplinger & Friedhelm C. Schmitt & Jürgen Voges & Simon Hanslmayr & Tobias Staudigl, 2022. "Rhythmic interactions between the mediodorsal thalamus and prefrontal cortex precede human visual perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Koun Onodera & Hiroyuki K. Kato, 2022. "Translaminar recurrence from layer 5 suppresses superficial cortical layers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Ayaka Kato & Kenji Morita, 2016. "Forgetting in Reinforcement Learning Links Sustained Dopamine Signals to Motivation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-41, October.
    4. Xin Wei Chia & Jian Kwang Tan & Lee Fang Ang & Tsukasa Kamigaki & Hiroshi Makino, 2023. "Emergence of cortical network motifs for short-term memory during learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Alyse Thomas & Weiguo Yang & Catherine Wang & Sri Laasya Tipparaju & Guang Chen & Brennan Sullivan & Kylie Swiekatowski & Mahima Tatam & Charles Gerfen & Nuo Li, 2023. "Superior colliculus bidirectionally modulates choice activity in frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Christophe Varin & Amandine Cornil & Delphine Houtteman & Patricia Bonnavion & Alban Kerchove d’Exaerde, 2023. "The respective activation and silencing of striatal direct and indirect pathway neurons support behavior encoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.