IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/0050017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural and Functional Diversity of the Microbial Kinome

Author

Listed:
  • Natarajan Kannan
  • Susan S Taylor
  • Yufeng Zhai
  • J Craig Venter
  • Gerard Manning

Abstract

The eukaryotic protein kinase (ePK) domain mediates the majority of signaling and coordination of complex events in eukaryotes. By contrast, most bacterial signaling is thought to occur through structurally unrelated histidine kinases, though some ePK-like kinases (ELKs) and small molecule kinases are known in bacteria. Our analysis of the Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) dataset reveals that ELKs are as prevalent as histidine kinases and may play an equally important role in prokaryotic behavior. By combining GOS and public databases, we show that the ePK is just one subset of a diverse superfamily of enzymes built on a common protein kinase–like (PKL) fold. We explored this huge phylogenetic and functional space to cast light on the ancient evolution of this superfamily, its mechanistic core, and the structural basis for its observed diversity. We cataloged 27,677 ePKs and 18,699 ELKs, and classified them into 20 highly distinct families whose known members suggest regulatory functions. GOS data more than tripled the count of ELK sequences and enabled the discovery of novel families and classification and analysis of all ELKs. Comparison between and within families revealed ten key residues that are highly conserved across families. However, all but one of the ten residues has been eliminated in one family or another, indicating great functional plasticity. We show that loss of a catalytic lysine in two families is compensated by distinct mechanisms both involving other key motifs. This diverse superfamily serves as a model for further structural and functional analysis of enzyme evolution. : The huge growth in sequence databases allows the characterization of every protein sequence by comparison with its relatives. Sequence comparisons can reveal both the key conserved functional motifs that define protein families and the variations specific to individual subfamilies, thus decorating any protein sequence with its evolutionary context. Inspired by the massive sequence trove from the Global Ocean Survey project, the authors looked in depth at the protein kinase–like (PKL) superfamily. Eukaryotic protein kinases (ePKs) are the pre-eminent controllers of eukaryotic cell biology and among the best studied of enzymes. By contrast, their prokaryotic relatives are much more poorly known. The authors hoped to both characterize and better understand these prokaryotic enzymes, and also, by contrast, provide insight into the core mechanisms of the eukaryotic protein kinases. The authors used remote homology methods, and bootstrapped on their discoveries to detect more than 45,000 PKL sequences. These clustered into 20 major families, of which the ePKs were just one. Ten residues are conserved between these families: 6 were known to be important in catalysis, but four more—including three highly conserved in ePKs—are still poorly understood, despite their ancient conservation. Extensive family-specific features were found, including the surprising loss of all but one of the ten key residues in one family or another. The authors explored some of these losses and found several cases in which changes in one key motif substitute for changes in another, demonstrating the plasticity of these sequences. Similar approaches can be used to better understand any other family of protein sequences. Over 45,000 kinases, including 16,000 identified in the GOS expedition, were classified into 20 distinct families. This massive sequence comparison revealed a structural flexibility within eukaryotic protein kinases that helps explain their huge expansion in eukaryotes.

Suggested Citation

  • Natarajan Kannan & Susan S Taylor & Yufeng Zhai & J Craig Venter & Gerard Manning, 2007. "Structural and Functional Diversity of the Microbial Kinome," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0050017
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0050017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0050017&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan M Goldberg & Gerard Manning & Allen Liu & Petra Fey & Karen E Pilcher & Yanji Xu & Janet L Smith, 2006. "The Dictyostelium Kinome—Analysis of the Protein Kinases from a Simple Model Organism," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Shibu Yooseph & Granger Sutton & Douglas B Rusch & Aaron L Halpern & Shannon J Williamson & Karin Remington & Jonathan A Eisen & Karla B Heidelberg & Gerard Manning & Weizhong Li & Lukasz Jaroszewski , 2007. "The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Expanding the Universe of Protein Families," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-35, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konrad U Foerstner & Tobias Doerks & Christopher J Creevey & Anja Doerks & Peer Bork, 2008. "A Computational Screen for Type I Polyketide Synthases in Metagenomics Shotgun Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meishun Yu & Menghui Zhang & Runying Zeng & Ruolin Cheng & Rui Zhang & Yanping Hou & Fangfang Kuang & Xuejin Feng & Xiyang Dong & Yinfang Li & Zongze Shao & Min Jin, 2024. "Diversity and potential host-interactions of viruses inhabiting deep-sea seamount sediments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Katharina Mir & Steffen Schober, 2014. "Selection Pressure in Alternative Reading Frames," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-7, October.
    3. Yael Baran & Eran Halperin, 2012. "Joint Analysis of Multiple Metagenomic Samples," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Morgan N Price & Paramvir S Dehal & Adam P Arkin, 2008. "FastBLAST: Homology Relationships for Millions of Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.
    5. Armstrong, Claire W. & Foley, Naomi S. & Tinch, Rob & van den Hove, Sybille, 2012. "Services from the deep: Steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 2-13.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0050017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.