IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/roiele/v6y2020i1p1-11id2656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study: Optimization of Underground Car Park Design and Safety Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefeng Wang
  • Jianbo Fang
  • Pengcheng Wu
  • Tianrong Huang
  • Jiawei Ge

Abstract

The development of underground space is a very complicated process, and the traditional 2D-based approach in engineering is not enough to solve the problems encountered. The 3D visualization brought by BIM technology greatly improves the accuracy of design and construction. This paper’s case is the underground parking lot development project of Shanghai International Shipping Service Center. The underground parking lot design and optimization is based on the Building Information Modeling (BIM)+ traffic simulation technology. And according to the actual condition of the parking lot, we established a safety evaluation index system, and constructed a micro-simulation road network through VISSIM, so that we can determine potential safety conflict points on each floor and make recommendations. Finally, based on fuzzy evaluation theory and analytic hierarchy process, we evaluated the safety level of the underground parking lot. The safety evaluation result shows that the junction of the passageway from the B2 to B1 is the main point of security conflict, and it is necessary to set up corresponding warning signs and guidance measures at these locations. The BIM + traffic simulation technology adopted in this paper is a new model, and this research has reference value for the development of urban underground parking systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefeng Wang & Jianbo Fang & Pengcheng Wu & Tianrong Huang & Jiawei Ge, 2020. "Case Study: Optimization of Underground Car Park Design and Safety Assessment," Review of Industrial Engineering Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:roiele:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:1-11:id:2656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/71/article/view/2656/4122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/71/article/view/2656/5456
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:roiele:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:1-11:id:2656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/71/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.