IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/roiele/v1y2014i1p25-35id2638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Iranian Accredited Laboratories with Proficiency Tests Using Promethee Method

Author

Listed:
  • Mousa Amini
  • Alireza Alinezhad
  • Hamid Najafabadiha

Abstract

The rapid pace of changing technology is leading to high rate of import and export between different countries. In outsourcing governmental organizations duties to private sectors, it is a need to control sectors and they should be under assessment policy. This research has been developed to show how the accredited laboratories of Iranian standard (ISIRI) can be assessed for their technical servicing using the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) in combination with proficiency testing inter- laboratories comparison, in order to rank them for an urgent or crucial need of testing any kind of goods or products under compulsory regulation or national standard for their quality or safety aspect. The proposed approach, therefore, allows a decision to be made with confidence that the alternative (laboratory) chosen has best performance for conformity assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mousa Amini & Alireza Alinezhad & Hamid Najafabadiha, 2014. "Ranking Iranian Accredited Laboratories with Proficiency Tests Using Promethee Method," Review of Industrial Engineering Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 1(1), pages 25-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:pkp:roiele:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:25-35:id:2638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/71/article/view/2638/4071
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agatha Rinta Suhardi & Shendy Amalia & Shinta Oktafien & Siska Ayudia Adiyanti & Siti Komariah & Titto Rohendra, 2019. "Time Series Analysis to Predicting Demand of Roasted Coffee Production," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 26-31, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:roiele:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:25-35:id:2638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/71/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.