IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomas/v9y2020i3p161-180id1082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Total Factor Productivity Changes in Islamic and Conventional Banks: Empirical Evidence from Three Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Ribed Vianneca W Jubilee
  • Fakarudin Kamarudin
  • Hafezali Iqbal Hussain
  • Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff
  • Nurazilah Zainal

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine total factor productivity changes (TFPCH) in Islamic and conventional banks to determine whether they exhibit progression or regression. As earlier studies have focused mainly on productivity in conventional banks rather than Islamic banks, the current study aims to bridge the gap in the literature by investigating both types of bank in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South Asia. A total of 385 Islamic and conventional banks from 18 countries were selected, with data acquired for the period from 2008 to 2017. Panel data analysis was undertaken using DEA-based MPI to investigate the impact of selected determinants of banks’ productivity, as indicated by TFPCH. The results from both the t-test and nonparametric tests revealed that Islamic banks are more productive than conventional banks, which can be attributed to the increase in efficiency changes. However, no statistically significant difference in productivity exists between the types of bank. The main contribution of this study is that it provides not only corroboration for previous studies but also additional insight into bank productivity in Islamic and conventional banks, which will be important to banks, regulators, investors, and researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribed Vianneca W Jubilee & Fakarudin Kamarudin & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff & Nurazilah Zainal, 2020. "Analysis of Total Factor Productivity Changes in Islamic and Conventional Banks: Empirical Evidence from Three Regions," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(3), pages 161-180.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:161-180:id:1082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/1082/1527
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/1082/4672
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:161-180:id:1082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.