IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijomas/v13y2024i1p14-25id3589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational commitment, religiosity, and auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection

Author

Listed:
  • Ni Nyoman Sri Rahayu Damayanti
  • Dian Agustia

Abstract

The government auditor plays a crucial role in the oversight and prevention of fraudulent activities inside the government. The examination of elements that influence the auditor's responsibilities in identifying fraud holds significant importance. This is also supported by previous literature, which states that there is quite a lot of understanding related to fraud behavior that has not been explored in the fields of accounting and auditing. This study aims to examine the influence of affective commitment, continuance commitment, normative commitment, and religiosity on the fraud detection responsibility of the auditor. The present study employed a quantitative methodology utilizing a survey-based research design. The participants in this research comprised a sample of 101 government auditors employed at the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia. The hypothesis was tested using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results showed that affective commitment, continuance commitment, normative commitment, and religiosity have a positive influence on the auditor’s responsibility in detecting fraud. This study also confirms the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). This research contributes to the development of literature related to behavioral accounting, especially regarding fraud detection responsibility. The implication of this research is that it is important for the audit board, especially human resource management, to consider providing activities that can increase the organizational commitment and religiosity of auditors, which can then be used as motivation for auditors to increase their responsibility in detecting fraud.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni Nyoman Sri Rahayu Damayanti & Dian Agustia, 2024. "Organizational commitment, religiosity, and auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(1), pages 14-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:14-25:id:3589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/3589/7862
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijomas:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:14-25:id:3589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.