IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v10y2022i4p371-380id3221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Decision-Making Processes as Evaluated by Students, Administrators, and Lecturers

Author

Listed:
  • Ha Thi Thu Le
  • Long Thanh Phan
  • Hang Thi Thuy Vu

Abstract

Modern society is undergoing numerous rapid changes, which include both opportunities and challenges for individuals of all ages. In this environment, young people, particularly students, are frequently confronted with situations that need them to choose and make decisions. The primary goal of this study was to (i) investigate variations in students' attitudes toward decision-making processes based on gender and school year. (ii) Students, administrators, and lecturers assess the students' own steps in putting decision-making into practice. A sample of 697 students and 120 administrators and lecturers were chosen from six school universities using the random sampling technique. Our research yielded the following results: (1) There is a statistically significant difference in male and female attitudes toward decision-making; and (2) there is a statistically significant difference in freshmen's and seniors' attitudes toward decision-making. Steps in student decision-making include: First, pupils decide to identify the issue. Next, they select the optimal solution. Step three is to make a list of potential possibilities. In the next stage, they collect the necessary information about the problem. Finally, students analyze each plan. This study implies that students, administrators, and lecturers rate students' decision-making processes equally.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha Thi Thu Le & Long Thanh Phan & Hang Thi Thuy Vu, 2022. "Student Decision-Making Processes as Evaluated by Students, Administrators, and Lecturers," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 10(4), pages 371-380.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:371-380:id:3221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3221/7241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3221/7306
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:371-380:id:3221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.