IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v10y2022i3p214-226id3059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness Perception of Policy Stakeholders in College Admission in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Kyoung-oh Song
  • Bo-Young Kwon
  • Yuri Jeong

Abstract

It has been known that Korea has the highest college enrollment rate due to the role that college entrance plays in determining the socioeconomic status of students in their future. About 10 years ago, the Ministry of Education in Korea initiated the Comprehensive School Report-based Admission (CSRA) under the recognition that the college admission system needs to be diversified. Since then, the fairness of the CSRA has been at the center of controversy. This study aimed to draw the implications for college admission policies by comparing the perception of the main stakeholders (students and parents, teachers, admission officers, and faculty admission committee) on the CSRA. The perception data of 150 participants on the six aspects of the CSRA were gathered through a questionnaire and the results were analyzed for group differences. A FGI was additionally administered with 12 participants. This study found that the stakeholders perceived the CSRA as important and necessary. However, the perception of the stakeholders on the fairness of the CSRA presented itself differently depending on the interests each group holds. The results of this study showed that close examination of the multifaceted perceptions and individualized experiences of the stakeholders should be taken into consideration when the perception of fairness in the CSRA is examined. It also implied that the government should provide stakeholders with the opportunities to be informed of the CSRA to promote trust in the policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyoung-oh Song & Bo-Young Kwon & Yuri Jeong, 2022. "Fairness Perception of Policy Stakeholders in College Admission in Korea," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 10(3), pages 214-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:214-226:id:3059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3059/6780
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3059/6862
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:214-226:id:3059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.