IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/frmrev/v8y2022i1p1-11id2919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Creditworthiness Modeling in Energy-Saving Finance: Machine Learning Logit and Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Herlan
  • Eka Sudarmaji
  • M Rubiul Yatim

Abstract

Customer's creditworthiness was becoming more crucial for ESCO. Machine learning was used to predict the creditworthiness of clients in retrofit financing processes. Machine learning was used to predict the creditworthiness of clients in ESCO financing processes. This research aimed to develop a retrofitting scoring model to leverage a machine learning and life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) to evaluate alternative financing for Energy Efficiency Saving in Indonesia. The model was built on the Logistic Regression model and Artificial Neural Networks model of machine learning. The model was developed and tested using the Python algorithm, and the proposed model's efficiency was demonstrated. The logistic regression calculations showed that the accuracy value of prediction data with test data was 88.3562 % and 87.67% for Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression models. The prediction rate result that refers to the correct predictions among all test data for Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression model was 92.20% and 91.98%, respectively. Meanwhile, the percentage of customers who were correct to all customers predicted to default was 94.41% for Artificial Neural Networks and 93.81% for the Logistic Regression model. Credit models were helpful to evaluate the risk of consumer loans. Finally, the quality and performance of these models were evaluated and compared to identify the best one. The logistic regression and neural network models obtained were good and very similar, although the neural network was slightly better.

Suggested Citation

  • Herlan & Eka Sudarmaji & M Rubiul Yatim, 2022. "Predictive Creditworthiness Modeling in Energy-Saving Finance: Machine Learning Logit and Neural Network," Financial Risk and Management Reviews, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:frmrev:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:1-11:id:2919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/article/view/2919/4886
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/article/view/2919/5844
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:frmrev:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:1-11:id:2919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/89/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.