IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v48y2009i4p771-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade Liberalisation Could Improve Producers Profitability in Agriculture: A Case of Basmati Rice

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Zulfiqar

    (Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat)

  • Dilawar Khan

    (Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat)

  • Anwar F. Chishti

    (Muhammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad)

  • Munir Khan

    (NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar)

  • Wasiullah

    (Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat)

  • Ajmal Waheed

    (Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad)

  • Muhammad Zakir

    (Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat)

  • Robina Karim

    (NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar)

Abstract

This peace of research has been conducted, as part of PhD research of the first author, with the objectives to (i) identify various protection policies and interventions exercised in Basmati rice economy in Pakistan (ii) estimate welfare effects associated with existing protection policies and (iii) to estimate implications of WTO’s trade liberalisation in domestic economy and foreign markets. The quantitative analysis of data reveals that Basmati rice crop hanged about ‘price tax-cum-export tax’ regime during the study period. Welfare analysis of such policy interventions estimated higher losses to producers (Pak Rs 657.95 million per year) than gains to consumers (Rs 448.76 million per year) during pre-WTO period. The same trend continued during post-WTO period but producers’ losses were comparatively smaller i.e., 649.48 million per year. In case of free trade, simulation results demonstrate greater gains to producers than losses to consumers. If world market was liberalised, supplementary gains in the range of Rs 276.65 million to Rs 451.60 million per year during earlier and Rs 333.45 million to Rs 637.40 million per year during the later period would have occurred at domestic level. In light of analytical results, the following recommendations are made. (i) Government needs to curtail interventions in Basmati rice economy. (ii) Besides, improving the pace of trade liberalisation at domestic level, Pakistan should pursue with other members in WTO’s negotiations for early implementation of WTO’s trade liberalisation on international level. (iii) Government of Pakistan should gear up its efforts as facilitator of trade in accordance with WTO agreements and increase investment in areas of research, development, and out-reach.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Zulfiqar & Dilawar Khan & Anwar F. Chishti & Munir Khan & Wasiullah & Ajmal Waheed & Muhammad Zakir & Robina Karim, 2009. "Trade Liberalisation Could Improve Producers Profitability in Agriculture: A Case of Basmati Rice," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 771-782.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:48:y:2009:i:4:p:771-782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2009/Volume4/771-782.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Basmati Rice; Government Intervention; Welfare Effect; Trade Liberalisation; WTO;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:48:y:2009:i:4:p:771-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.