IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/phs/pcedpn/201401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How did the Philippines level its tax treatment of imported and local distilled spirits?

Author

Listed:
  • Ramon L. Clarete

    (UP School of Economics, Diliman, Quezon City)

Abstract

On February 22, 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) found the Philippines to have violated its national treatment obligation on distilled spirits, urging the government to undertake the required correction to the relevant tax laws. The body ruled in favor of the European Union, which filed the complaint on July 29, 2009, alleging that the Philippines had discriminated against imported distilled spirits by taxing these products at higher rates than distilled spirits derived from sugar and other designated materials. Under the national treatment principle, a contracting member state is committed to apply its internal taxes equally on both imported and locally produced products covered.On January 28, 2013, the Philippines notified the WTO that it had complied with the decision of the DSB by enacting the Sin Tax Reform Law of 2012.It turns out that the Sin Tax Law had taxed local spirits at a higher rate compared to imported ones. This is documented in this note, along with a discussion on the implications of the distortion on the local markets of distilled spirits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon L. Clarete, . "How did the Philippines level its tax treatment of imported and local distilled spirits?," PCED Policy Notes, Philippine Center for Economic Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:pcedpn:201401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pced.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PN-2014-1_FINAL-rev_-digital.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:pcedpn:201401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.