IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfq/journl/v55y2010i1p104-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The hen lays no golden eggs – thoughts about the pension funds

Author

Listed:
  • Kun, János

Abstract

As opposed to what was assumed at the inception of private pension funds in 1998, the funds do not facilitate economic growth; on the contrary, they increase the general government deficit, deteriorate the image of Hungarian economy, and hinder compliance with the Maastricht criteria for euro convergence. Private fund members are far from being secured a higher pension compared to non-members. The world is witnessing a paradigm shift: countries are restricting or terminating their private pension fund systems, and the World Bank has reassessed its position that was clearly supportive of the establishment of such funds. To its current knowledge, it would not recommend that Hungary establish private pension funds. The hen lays no golden eggs, and the most beneficial action would be to discontinue private pension funds. Discontinuation would result in a HUF 500 bn annual reduction in the general government deficit shown, as a minimum, and would decrease government debt by eight and a half percent of the GDP. Should there be no opportunity to discontinue them, the second best option is voluntary membership, allowing members to return to the social security system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun, János, 2010. "The hen lays no golden eggs – thoughts about the pension funds," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 55(1), pages 104-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:55:y:2010:i:1:p:104-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/9110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:55:y:2010:i:1:p:104-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bkeeehu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.