IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfq/journl/v51y2006i3p341-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The external auditor’s role in regulation – An insight into the advisory activity of the National Audit Office of the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Bourn, Sir John

Abstract

There has been considerable growth in recent years of government regulations over a whole range of activities and businesses. Regulation is a product of the way in which society perceives and responds to risk. In devising regulations, there must be a proper consideration of where the risks lie and how to balance the need for protection against the need to foster a society where people accept and share responsibility for managing life's risks. Good, effective regulation requires proper risk analysis, a thorough assessment of cost versus benefits and an independent approach – all skills that can be well deployed by the external auditor. In the UK, the National Audit Office has been working with the Better Regulation Commission to reduce regulatory burdens without endangering regulatory outcomes. The Better Regulation Commission (www.brc.gov.uk) is an independent body which is responsible for advising and challenging the Government on regulatory reform, and scrutinising the Government's plans for regulatory simplification. Its focus on reducing burdens has the benefit of releasing resources for higher value activities, increasing voluntary compliance and improving legitimacy. This paper concludes that regulatory reform is an important issue for Supreme Audit Institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bourn, Sir John, 2006. "The external auditor’s role in regulation – An insight into the advisory activity of the National Audit Office of the United Kingdom," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 51(3), pages 341-346.
  • Handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:341-346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/9316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:341-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bkeeehu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.