IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfi/pubfin/v44y1989i1p110-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Empirical Evidence on the Social Welfare Maximization Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Yunker, James A

Abstract

Evidence is presented that suggests that the concept of social welfare maximization, always heretofore considered part of normative economics, may possess positive content. A simple, but comprehensive, general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy is developed and numerically implemented. According to the simple model, the aggregate average tax rate that maximizes the Benthamite (sum of utilities) social welfare criterion is 0.39. For a Nash (product of utilities) social welfare criterion, the corresponding optimal tax rate is 0.42. These values are quite close to the aggregate average tax rate currently prevailing in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunker, James A, 1989. "Some Empirical Evidence on the Social Welfare Maximization Hypothesis," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 44(1), pages 110-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:110-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James A. Yunker, 1999. "Application of The els Model: Optimal Tax Rate and Public Good Proportion," Public Finance Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 19-51, January.
    2. Takao FUKUCHI, 1998. "A Simulation Analysis Of The Urban Informal Sector," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 36(3), pages 225-256, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:110-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.