IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v17y2017i2p69-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Volkswagen Emissions Scandal - A Case Study on Unethical Business Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Codruţa Dura

    (University of Petroşani, Romania)

Abstract

At the end of 2015, car manufacturing industry was rocked by the disclosure of an unethical practice used by Volkswagen, one of the most prominent actors within automotive industry. Following the research on environmental procedures conducted by the International Council of Clean Transporation (ICTT) and West Virginia University, representatives of the Volskswagen group (VW) have been forced to admit that they had deliberately installed some “defeat devices” aimed at reducing the amount of emissions registered during vehicle testing under laboratory conditions. Thus, on road vehicle tests revealed a 0.85 g km-1 level of NOx emissions for VW Jetta and VW Passat, exceeding over four times the maximum limit of 0.18 g km-1 stipulated by the European regulations. Taking into consideration the direct impact on health condition of the people living in the affected countries and the huge amount of costs associated whith the overflow of pollution form VW cars, the paper brings into focus some systems of ethical analysis provided by the literature - utilitarianism, the ethics of virtues, universalism and teleological theory – in order to demonstrate why this unethical business practice severely altered sustainability principles and should be eradicated in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Codruţa Dura, 2017. "The Volkswagen Emissions Scandal - A Case Study on Unethical Business Practices," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 69-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:69-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2017/p2/Dura.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unethical practice; utilitarian theory; virtue ethics; deonthological ethics; utilitarianism; teleological theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:69-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.