Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Intellectuals’ Opinion Regarding The Integration Of Romania Into The European Union

Contents:

Author Info

  • Mariana Anghel

    ()
    (University of Petrosani, Romania)

  • Vasile Ciocodeică

    ()
    (University of Petrosani, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The sociological study emphasizes the fact that the investigated persons are sceptic as regards the carrying out of the objectives of integration into the European Union. In order to have a more stable economy premises closer to the European ones should be provided; the de-inflation process should be continued and a stricter financial discipline should be observed by companies with a view to maintaining a proper economic policy and attaining economic stability. The major changes that are going to occur in Romania should take into account the increase of labour productivity and the quality of products and services. A collective effort must be done in order to accomplish transition and head towards a modern society.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2010/20100201.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by University of Petrosani, Romania in its journal Annals of the University of Petrosani - Economics.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 5-12

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:5-12

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.upet.ro/

    Related research

    Keywords: integration; community; cooperation; negotiation; economic environment; durable development;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Imola Driga).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.