IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v12y2021i3p821-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of evaluating inpatients’ satisfaction with emphasis on the aspect of confidence

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Gavurova

    (Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic)

  • Matus Kubak

    (Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Research background: The patients’ confidence in physicians, as well as in healthcare personnel in general, is an important determinant of the patients’ satisfaction and their loyalty. The patients’ confidence as well as their overall satisfaction is influenced by many determinants, which are in a causal relation. Purpose of the article: The main aim of the study is to find out which socio-demographic factors influence the confidence of inpatients in physicians, nurses, other medical personnel, as well as in the treatment as such. The inpatients´ confidence is considered as an important dimension of the inpatients’ satisfaction. Methods: The questionnaire consists of 112 structured and semi-structured sur-vey questions. It was inspired by the HCAHPS survey. The questionnaire was distributed both on-line and in paper form in the Czech Republic. The dataset consists of 1,479 observations (899 females and 580 males). The descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to process all data. Findings & value added: The research revealed significant differences in the confidence of inpatients in physicians in relation to the physicians’ communication styles regarding the inpatient’s gender. Males are more tolerant to the communication styles of physicians than women. There exists a relatively strong linear relationship between confidence in physicians, nurses, other healthcare professionals, and confidence in a treatment. Also, it was determined that in cases when a physician talks about an inpatient as if she/he is not there, the patient’s confidence in the medical personnel is reduced by 65%. Overall confidence in medical personnel is also gender biased i.e., in 87% of cases, women are more likely to have a higher confidence in medical personnel than men. The age of inpatients is not statistically significant and its impact on a confidence in medical personnel is neglectable.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Gavurova & Matus Kubak, 2021. "The importance of evaluating inpatients’ satisfaction with emphasis on the aspect of confidence," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 821-848, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:821-848
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2021.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2021.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tetiana Vasylieva & Beata Gavurova & Tetiana Dotsenko & Svitlana Bilan & Marcin Strzelec & Samer Khouri, 2023. "The Behavioral and Social Dimension of the Public Health System of European Countries: Descriptive, Canonical, and Factor Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-35, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inpatient satisfaction; quality of healthcare; confidence of inpatients; patient’s expectations.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:821-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.