IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/iercxy/v4y2019i1p45-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dobrobyt spoleczny w swietle ekonomii szczescia na przykladzie wy-branych panstw Unii Europejskiej
[Social welfare in light of the economy of happiness based on selected European Union countries]

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Wachowiak

    (Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland)

  • Kamil Kowalczyk

    (Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland)

Abstract

Motivation: One of the basic problem in macroeconomics is issue of wealth of nations. In the past, a significant part of economists, used to identify the scale of economy, or dynamics of its growth, with the life rate. Nowadays, the evaluation of wealth of a society comes down to the rating the quality of life in a given country. In the mainstream of macroeconom-ics discourse, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), alongside with its derivatives, is used as a key method of measurement. Unfortunately, those indicators do not include a number of key aspects, that influence the wealth ratio. Be-cause of that, throughout the years a new, expanded approach and new indicators were developed, for example the Human Development Index (HDI). It seems essential to consider their cognitive value in the context of a modern approach to the economy of happiness. For this purpose, an overview of the most popular wealth and quality of life indicators was compiled, and was confronted with non-economic data considering the processes happening in societies, with a main focus being the interpreta-tional disparities, and possible different outcomes. Aim: The aim of the article is the evaluation of quality of life rate by overviewing available solu-tions and methods, and confrontation of the result with public statistic data considering the selected countries of the European Union (EU). Materials and methods: The systematic review and critical analysis of sources, aggre-gated macroeconomics data analysis and public statistics were used. Data published by Eurostat, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Devel-opment (OECD), World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank were considered empirical material. Results: There are significant differ-ences in the evaluation of life quality between the indicators used in the main economics discourse and the empirical data from other studies i.e. social and medical.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Wachowiak & Kamil Kowalczyk, 2019. "Dobrobyt spoleczny w swietle ekonomii szczescia na przykladzie wy-branych panstw Unii Europejskiej [Social welfare in light of the economy of happiness based on selected European Union countries]," Catallaxy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 4(1), pages 45-55, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:iercxy:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:45-55
    DOI: 10.24136/cxy.2019.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/cxy.2019.003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/cxy.2019.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    wealth; happiness; contentment; macroeconomics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E19 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Other
    • F59 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Other
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:iercxy:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:45-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilona Pietryka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.